User talk:Millermk: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Thanks very much for reviewing the page and providing feedback. |
Thanks very much for reviewing the page and providing feedback. |
||
I was disheartened to hear it hasn't made it through based on the history section as I had just changed this from a timeline format (which I had to remove potential of an advertisement tone). |
I was disheartened to hear it hasn't made it through based on the history section as I had just changed this from a timeline format (which I had to remove potential of an advertisement tone). As the previous reviewer said it needed to be in a paragraphed format as opposed to timeline, as it appeared more like a fact sheet and needed to be more readable/flow. Now it has been pinged for being too closely aligned to a essay - I feel I am at a lost here. |
||
Is there a chance that only one reviewer (ie you) goes over it going forward, just to stop contradictory information. As you can see I have submitted a few attempts and each rejection, especially when you feel contradictory direction was given, starts to really deflate you. |
Is there a chance that only one reviewer (ie you) goes over it going forward, just to stop contradictory information. As you can see I have submitted a few attempts and each rejection, especially when you feel contradictory direction was given, starts to really deflate you. |
||
Revision as of 07:21, 17 April 2015
 | This page is archived frequently because I like short talk pages, and I'm a little OCD. You can find the archives on the right. Please feel free to continue an archived discussion here, I still care/want to talk about it. Really, I seriously do. |
|
Sorted by date:
|
Hello, and welcome to my talk page! Feel free to leave me a note about whatever's on your mind, especially if you think I may have made a mistake, because I definitely want to do my best to fix it up! I really appreciate it when people add a new heading, sign their comments, link to relevent diffs, and generally follow good talk page ettiquette, so please do so. millermk
07:20:01, 17 April 2015 review of submission by 125.213.191.72
Hi Millermk,
Thanks very much for reviewing the page and providing feedback. I was disheartened to hear it hasn't made it through based on the history section as I had just changed this from a timeline format (which I had to remove potential of an advertisement tone). As the previous reviewer said it needed to be in a paragraphed format as opposed to timeline, as it appeared more like a fact sheet and needed to be more readable/flow. Now it has been pinged for being too closely aligned to a essay - I feel I am at a lost here.
Is there a chance that only one reviewer (ie you) goes over it going forward, just to stop contradictory information. As you can see I have submitted a few attempts and each rejection, especially when you feel contradictory direction was given, starts to really deflate you.
Thanks,
Lauren