Jump to content

Talk:Constructive analysis: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Explanation: new section
Not Common: new section
Line 4: Line 4:


Could the article explain what constructive analysis is, besides giving examples? For example, which constructions/proofs etc. are exactly allowed? I regret I am not sufficiently expert in the topic, thank you.[[User:Paolo Lipparini|Paolo Lipparini]] ([[User talk:Paolo Lipparini|talk]]) 15:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
Could the article explain what constructive analysis is, besides giving examples? For example, which constructions/proofs etc. are exactly allowed? I regret I am not sufficiently expert in the topic, thank you.[[User:Paolo Lipparini|Paolo Lipparini]] ([[User talk:Paolo Lipparini|talk]]) 15:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

== Not Common ==

"there are several other conditions which imply it and which are commonly met; for example, every analytic function..."

This seems to suggest that it is "common" for a continuous function to be analytic, which is not the case of course. This should probably be re-phrased a bit.

Revision as of 08:54, 11 May 2015

WikiProject iconMathematics Start‑class Mid‑priority
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

Explanation

Could the article explain what constructive analysis is, besides giving examples? For example, which constructions/proofs etc. are exactly allowed? I regret I am not sufficiently expert in the topic, thank you.Paolo Lipparini (talk) 15:48, 19 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not Common

"there are several other conditions which imply it and which are commonly met; for example, every analytic function..."

This seems to suggest that it is "common" for a continuous function to be analytic, which is not the case of course. This should probably be re-phrased a bit.