User talk:Sidsandyy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
:Thanks for the reply.But when I read the linked page in your reply it clearly stated that"If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble"& I did the same thing, but with the reference.Then block is because of reference or my edited Material still in doubt?[[User:Sidsandyy|sidsandyy]] ([[User talk:Sidsandyy#top|talk]]) 02:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
:Thanks for the reply.But when I read the linked page in your reply it clearly stated that"If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble"& I did the same thing, but with the reference.Then block is because of reference or my edited Material still in doubt?[[User:Sidsandyy|sidsandyy]] ([[User talk:Sidsandyy#top|talk]]) 02:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
::I don't see a retelling in your own words, I see that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_of_matter&diff=prev&oldid=662710673 this] was taken from [http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-discovered-a-new-state-of-matter-the-jahn-teller-effect here]. [[User:MaxSem|Max Semenik]] ([[User talk:MaxSem|talk]]) 06:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
::I don't see a retelling in your own words, I see that [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=State_of_matter&diff=prev&oldid=662710673 this] was taken from [http://www.sciencealert.com/scientists-have-discovered-a-new-state-of-matter-the-jahn-teller-effect here]. [[User:MaxSem|Max Semenik]] ([[User talk:MaxSem|talk]]) 06:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
||
Man,this is too good.Keep blocking you are doing great job.Next time what if I write it in my own words and gave same reference I had will I be blocked again?[[User:Sidsandyy|sidsandyy]] ([[User talk:Sidsandyy#top|talk]]) 13:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
Man,this is too good.Keep blocking you are doing great job.Next time what if I write it in my own words and gave same [advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/3/e1500059 reference] I had will I be blocked again?[[User:Sidsandyy|sidsandyy]] ([[User talk:Sidsandyy#top|talk]]) 13:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:54, 18 May 2015
Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Sidsandyy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
The reason being is I gave the right source for my edit or the reference you will need [1].You can check this link with proper discription. sidsandyy (talk) 07:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately, just mentioning the source makes no difference. The material itself must come under a free license compatible with ours, otherwise it's a copyright violation. Please read the linked page and indicate your understanding of it. Max Semenik (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Thanks for the reply.But when I read the linked page in your reply it clearly stated that"If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble"& I did the same thing, but with the reference.Then block is because of reference or my edited Material still in doubt?sidsandyy (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- I don't see a retelling in your own words, I see that this was taken from here. Max Semenik (talk) 06:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Man,this is too good.Keep blocking you are doing great job.Next time what if I write it in my own words and gave same [advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/3/e1500059 reference] I had will I be blocked again?sidsandyy (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)