User talk:Sidsandyy

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 04:24, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sidsandyy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The reason being is I gave the right source for my edit or the reference you will need [1].You can check this link with proper discription. sidsandyy (talk) 07:17, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Unfortunately, just mentioning the source makes no difference. The material itself must come under a free license compatible with ours, otherwise it's a copyright violation. Please read the linked page and indicate your understanding of it. Max Semenik (talk) 16:29, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for the reply.But when I read the linked page in your reply it clearly stated that"If in doubt, write the content yourself, thereby creating a new copyrighted work which can be included in Wikipedia without trouble"& I did the same thing, but with the reference.Then block is because of reference or my edited Material still in doubt?sidsandyy (talk) 02:31, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

I don't see a retelling in your own words, I see that this was taken from here. Max Semenik (talk) 06:14, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Man,this is too good.Keep blocking you are doing great job.Next time what if I write it in my own words and gave same reference I had will I be blocked again?sidsandyy (talk) 13:35, 18 May 2015 (UTC)