User talk:Myanw/Archive1

Welcome! Hello, Myanw/Archive1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers: User Pages The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help pages Tutorial How to write a great article Manual of Style My FAQ Page Glossary What wikipedia is not Requested Articles Reference Desk Assume good faith Sandbox (This page is for testing) I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me or an experienced wikipedian like Sango123 and JoanneB and leave your message on our talk page. Again, welcome! If you want to tell me something or if you just want to say hi, leave your message under the Talk Section of | My Talk Page Once you've become an experienced Wikipedian, please take your time to visit this page: WikiProjects Anonymous_Anonymous

subst: when using TestTemplates

I was just about to warn a user that you had previously warned, but you snuck in and warned him just ahead of me. =) Nice catch. However, I noticed that you don't always subst: when you issue warnings. You should always subst: when using the TestTemplates. -- Gogo Dodo 20:09, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Re your message: No worries. =) I missed the policy the first time, too. I believe there are couple of bots running that will find your warnings and change them to subst: so there is no need for you to fix the old warnings. If you really get into vandal fighting (it looks like you are), you might look into some of the tools that are available. I personally use popups and ARV, but there are many tools out there. -- Gogo Dodo 20:30, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my User page. =) -- Gogo Dodo 20:50, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

You're welcome ;-) - Myanw 20:53, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Re your message: Just a little payback. =) That was an odd article. Normally you don't see such odd edits last for a couple of days. I think it was the obscurity of the topic that caused the long delay in cleaning things up. -- Gogo Dodo 06:39, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

see proof before reverting!

do not start reverting war!

I replied on your talk page User talk:71.99.115.10 - Myanw 16:44, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

Myanw, I added some content to this page re Hidenburg and Robert Myers keps reverting it. H ehas previously had nil to do with this page but has previously been vandalising multiple pages I have put posts on. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.1 (talk • contribs) .

Hello, can I ask you to sign your message next time? Thanks - Regarding your edits on Battle of the Hindenburg Line my problem is that the name of the Australian captain is not relevant IMHO, is he notable enough to be named in Wikipedia? If you can prove he is, I'll have no further objection - Cheers - Myanw 12:24, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

Yes he is not just about that he led that attack but that he also wrote many of the unit histories for the Australian Forces in WW1 and is archived in our National war museum as well as in the Battye Archives in Perth. He was also awarded an Order of Leopold (Knighthood) and Croix de Guerre for his actions in France and the Hindenburg battles. He was a noted Journalist and War Correspondent and was mentioned multiple times in the official Australian history of WW1 by Australia's official war historian. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.1 (talk • contribs) .

Ok then, I suppose you already tried to create an entry for this man? If not, try to do that first and don't forget not to do any personnal attack, even if I understand you may feel frustrated by the reverts, you'd rather bring a request for arbitration instead - Myanw 12:49, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I can't because whatever I post here, Robert Myers or Atktos or longhair, delete. I thought the rules here were that everyone can post stuff. I have been amazed by the aggro from some admins here and how they get away with totally vandalising pages. If I try and put anything up for Cyril Longmore here it will just get taken straight down. It is ridiculous. Its not that I feel frustrated. I am under constant personal attack by the three above people. Is that how wik runs? Note the tone below re "The IP is the same Anon". I have not been blocked at all the last week. If that is because I avoid reading messages they send me, that is because the first couple I read my computer security disconnected me from wik and when I logged back on, my remote access had been changed enabling access into my computer by anyone. (i.e. there was something in the messages that my computer security objected to. As I am on a uni network of our largest Oz Uni I am obliged to not infect their system hence my computer security and my reluctance after the intrusions into my computer from wik to open many sites here that lead to the personal computers of other editors, especially given the attacks on me. There was some nonsense re me being on a uni server or something, (I am for the purpose of my communication with that uni but not for the purpose of me logging on to wik). My IP changes as I am on dial up Internet which resets regularly, not for any other reason. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by User:203.54.9.1 (talk • contribs) .

It appears that there's a pattern in common between the said blocked user and yourself in the way you edit articles, that's what leads certain contributers to consider the both of you to be one single individual, if you're indeed the said blocked user, I advise you to cool down and wait for the end of your blocking period, if you're not, please post a request for arbitration and try to sort things out peacefully (and please, one more time, try to sign your messages on talk pages, it's not difficult, you know just under the "show changes" button, there's a "sign your name" thingy, try clicking on that ^^) --Myanw 13:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• • The IP is that same Anon. The person using the IP has been blocked a number of times by Admin's over the last week. Wikipedia:Requests for comment/203.54.*.* -- RobertM 12:39, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• • A number of the 203.54.*.* have been blocked a number of times such as User:203.54.186.138 block. The same IP (203.54.9.1) tonight vandalised the Wagga Wagga page which was totally uncalled for. -- RobertM 13:09, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

I TOTALLY ADMIT THE ABOVE ROBERT MYERS AS YOU KNOW I DO. IT WAS TO TEACH U SOME EMPATHY AND RESPECT. DID IT WORK? ISNT IT A REAL PAIN WHEN SOMEONE DOES THAT TO STUFF U HAVE SPENT AGES ON TYPING IN. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT ABOUT YOU AND YOUR EGO BELEIVE IT OR NOT, IT IS ABOUT GETTING THIS INFO UP HERE IN AS GOOD AND CORRECT A MANNER AS POSSIBLE. IT IS NOT ABOUT SLANGING RACIST COMMENTS AT HIGHLY REGARDED AUSTRALIAN INDIGENOUS ELDERS OR FIGHTING WITH ME OR POSTING UP MAJOR INACCURACIES JUST BECAUSE SOMEONE ELSE MADE ERRORS IN BOOKS, BUT ABOUT THE PREVIOUS.

• • I am not racist! I respect the Indigenous Australians. You have never given any prove of your sources. -- RobertM 13:53, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• • They are the blocked user. They just return with a new IP. Also they have been told to sign there messages but they always fail to do so. -- RobertM 13:19, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

ROBERT MYERS. IT IS MY TELCO ASSIGNS MY IP, NOT ME. I AM NOT POWERFUL ENOUGH TO ASSIGN MY IP BELIEVE IT OR NOT. I AM A 55 YEAR ODL GREY HAIRED WOMAN WITH A LOT OF ACADEMIC AND PRACTICAL SKILLS, A MESSED UP ARM WHICH MESSES MY TYPING UP AND A LOT OF CONTENT HERE TO POST HERE FROM THE AUSTRALIAN STUDIES/ARCHAOLOGY/HERITAGE/SOCIAL SCIENCE/ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE QUALS I HAVE ACHIEVED THE LAST 10 YEARS. I DO NOT PLAY WAR GAMES ON THE INTERNET NOR IS IT A HOBBY OF MINE AND NEVER HAS BEEN AS HAVING BEEN IN THE ADF, I DONT THINK WAR A GAME, LIKE SOME DO. ITS PROBABLY TIME YOU BACKED OFF WITH THIS WAR YOU HAVE BEEN WAGING HERE AND FOUND SOMEONE NEARER YOUR OWN AGE TO FIGHT FIGHTS WITH.

• • All you have to do is dissconnect and reconnect to get a new IP to avoid the block. I have never tryed to pick a fight with you. -- RobertM 13:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

SO I AM TO NOT LOG ON TO THE INTERNET EVER TO PLEASE YOU? ONCE SOMEONE TRIED TO GET ME TO STAY WITHIN MY GATE AS I OFFENDED THEM AND THEY JUST GOT OFF MULTIPLE S.9 BONDS. THEY ENDED UP GOING TROPPO AS THEY WERE ARE ALCOHOLIC AND THEIR MIND WAS STARTING TO CONK OUT. IF I LOG BACK ON TO THE INTERNET WHEN I GET HOME FROM BEING OUT, OR TO DO SOME MORE UNI WORK, I WILL. THAT IS NOT TO YOU TO TRY AND REGULATE. IF YOU HAVE COMPLAINTS WITH DIAL UP INTERNET CONNECTIONS, DISCUSS THEM WITH THE OZ TELCO REGULATOR. I HAVE MY DIALUP AS ITS ALL I CAN AFOFRD PLUS I HAVE THIS THING ABOUT REVERSE ENGINEERING. DONT U THINK YOU ARE BEIGN A BIT UNREASONABLE? IF YOU STOP FIGHTING THERE WONT BE BLOCKS. ITS NOT ME NEEDS BLOCKING AND U KNOW THAT. DO YOU ALWAYS FIGHT WITH OLD WOMEN?

• • Since the Anon cannot prove that the information is true (A URL to the source) i will continue to revert the Battle of the Hindenburg Line page. -- RobertM 13:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

THE CITATION FOR CYRIL LONGMORE IS ALREADY POSTED. THERE ARE MORE CITATIONS IN BEANS HISTORY OF WW1 AND AT BATTYE LIBRARY, AND AT AUSTRALIAN WAR MEMORIAL AND ON GOOGLE.

• • Please link to the story/article. -- RobertM 13:56, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

ITS LINKED ALSO