Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

The discussion process is used for potentially controversial moves. If any of the following apply to a desired move, treat it as potentially controversial:

• There is an existing article (not just a redirect) at the target title;
• There has been any past debate about the best title for the page;
• Someone could reasonably disagree with the move.

If a desired move is uncontroversial and technical in nature (e.g. spelling), please feel free to move the page yourself. If the page has recently been moved without discussion, you may revert the move and initiate a discussion on its talk page. In either case, if you are unable to complete the move, request it below.

• To list a technical request, go to the bottom of this section that you are reading right now; edit the subsection Uncontroversial technical requests; insert the following code at the top:

{{subst:RMassist|<!--old page name, without brackets-->|<!--requested name, without brackets-->|reason= <!--reason for move-->}}

This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.

• If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move it to the Contested technical requests section.

• If your technical request is contested by another editor, please remove it from the contested technical requests section and follow the instructions at Requesting potentially controversial moves.

• Alternatively, if the only obstacle to an uncontroversial move is another page in the way, you can ask for the deletion of the other page. This may apply, for example, if the other page is currently a redirect to the article to be moved, a redirect with no incoming links, or an unnecessary disambiguation page with a minor edit history. To request the other page be deleted, add the following code to the top of the page that is in the way:

{{db-move|<!--page to be moved here-->|<!--reason for move-->}}

This will list the undesired page for deletion under criterion for speedy deletion G6. If the page is a redirect, place the code above the redirection. For a list of articles being considered for uncontroversial speedy deletion, see Category:Candidates for uncontroversial speedy deletion.

Uncontroversial technical requests

• Durga Mandir (disambiguation) → Durga Mandir (move · discuss) – No primary topic – Midas02 (talk) 01:19, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

• Electric energy → Electrical energy (move · discuss) – The article begins with "Electrical energy is the energy newly derived ...", so the lemma should be named "electrical energy"; So far there is redirect from "electrical energy" to "electric energy", as the article uses electrical energy, the redirect should be the other way around. – Gunnar (talk) 23:29, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
  • NOTE there is edit history at the requested title that was merged into other targets. It will need to be preserved. Suggest moving the edit history at electrical energy to energy (electrical) to clear the way for the request -- 70.51.46.11 (talk) 04:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

• Hashem minaiy → Hashem Minaiy (move · discuss) – proper capitalization – Innerspin3250 (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• List of counts of Artois → Count of Artois (move · discuss) – By Wikipedia standarts and in line with other articles – Fabrizor (talk) 20:51, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

• Planet Dog → Planet Dog Records (move · discuss) – The link in the article brings the viewer to http://www.planetdogrecords.com/. With the UK labeling company being Planet Dog Records, the article's title should reflect that and be changed to "Planet Dog Records” – Pdmedia (talk) 18:56, 4 June 2015 (UTC)