User talk:VagaboundWind: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 10:40, 5 June 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VagaboundWind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not sock puppet VagaboundWind (talk) 14:14, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The evidence appears to suggest otherwise. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VagaboundWind (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

May be a misunderstanding, i don't know what's happening. Why are you accusing me.? VagaboundWind (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

To believe that, I would have to believe in a hell of a lot of remarkable coincidences, even just looking at the behavioural evidence. Add the fact that CheckUser says "sockpuppet" too, and it's beyond any reasonable doubt. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 16:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Ponyo:, You deleted the articles i created and images i uploaded. I know its bcoz of the block, But most of the artocles were reliably sourced and met with all the articles guidelines and were important articles (atleast some of them). So i request to recreate those articles and pictures. If this is not your concern ignore this message. VagaboundWind (talk) 10:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 10:02, 5 June 2015 edit VagaboundWind (talk \| contribs) 1,077 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 10:40, 5 June 2015 edit undo VagaboundWind (talk \| contribs) 1,077 edits No edit summary Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	{{unblock reviewed \| 1=May be a misunderstanding, i don't know what's happening. Why are you accusing me.? [[User:VagaboundWind\|VagaboundWind]] ([[User talk:VagaboundWind#top\|talk]]) 06:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC) \| decline = To believe that, I would have to believe in a hell of a lot of remarkable coincidences, even just looking at the behavioural evidence. Add the fact that CheckUser says "sockpuppet" too, and it's beyond any reasonable doubt. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson\|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top\|talk]]) 16:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)}}		{{unblock reviewed \| 1=May be a misunderstanding, i don't know what's happening. Why are you accusing me.? [[User:VagaboundWind\|VagaboundWind]] ([[User talk:VagaboundWind#top\|talk]]) 06:37, 4 June 2015 (UTC) \| decline = To believe that, I would have to believe in a hell of a lot of remarkable coincidences, even just looking at the behavioural evidence. Add the fact that CheckUser says "sockpuppet" too, and it's beyond any reasonable doubt. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson\|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top\|talk]]) 16:47, 4 June 2015 (UTC)}}

			{{ping\|Ponyo}}, You deleted the articles i created and images i uploaded. I know its bcoz of the block, But most of the artocles were reliably sourced and met with all the articles guidelines and were important articles (atleast some of them). So i request to recreate those articles and pictures. If this is not your concern ignore this message. [[User:VagaboundWind\|VagaboundWind]] ([[User talk:VagaboundWind#top\|talk]]) 10:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)