Talk:Pygmy mammoth: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:33, 6 June 2015

Geology Start‑class Low‑importance

	Geology portal Talk:Pygmy mammoth is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mammals Start‑class Low‑importance

	Mammals portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Extinction Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

caps in title

Why is "Mammoth" capitalized in the title? It isn't so treated in the text, and I thought capitalization was supposed to follow spelling rules in sentences, with the first word of the title treated as the first word of a sentence.~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.179.16.71 (talk) 03:30, 6 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I plan to delete this because it has no reliable source and because the largest animal on the island then was a mouse. Since the bones were undisturbed, it is predicted he simply died of old age. ~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD (talk) 04:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

First there is no evidence of mammouth hunting, and following this claim, there is a total contradiction with many remains of examples cooked. Someone can explain this???

Revision as of 04:46, 21 February 2015 edit SineBot (talk \| contribs) Bots 2,550,303 edits m Signing comment by 2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD - "→‎caps in title: " ← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:33, 6 June 2015 edit undo 159.20.209.65 (talk) →‎caps in title Next edit →
Line 8:		Line 8:

	I plan to delete this because it has no reliable source and because the largest animal on the island then was a mouse. Since the bones were undisturbed, it is predicted he simply died of old age. ~~ <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD\|2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD]] ([[User talk:2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD\|talk]]) 04:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->		I plan to delete this because it has no reliable source and because the largest animal on the island then was a mouse. Since the bones were undisturbed, it is predicted he simply died of old age. ~~ <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD\|2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD]] ([[User talk:2601:C:9100:5E6:4813:D6FA:F03E:72AD\|talk]]) 04:45, 21 February 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


			First there is no evidence of mammouth hunting, and following this claim, there is a total contradiction with many remains of examples cooked. Someone can explain this???