User talk:68.9.141.171: Difference between revisions
SandyGeorgia (talk | contribs) →NPOV: WP:BLP |
|||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
==Joe Lieberman== |
==Joe Lieberman== |
||
Per [[WP:BLP]], please do not add negative criticism about a living person without a verifiable reference. Negative criticism of a living person is not subject to 3RR, and will be reverted when inserted without a reference. Thanks, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 22:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC) |
Per [[WP:BLP]], please do not add negative criticism about a living person without a verifiable reference. Negative criticism of a living person is not subject to 3RR, and will be reverted when inserted without a reference. Thanks, [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 22:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC) |
||
Thanks, I've been adding web links...obviously the CT e;ection is presently vvery fluid and am trying to keep folks up to date |
Revision as of 00:24, 31 July 2006
Hi! I'm just writing to you to let you know that Wikipedia is NPOV. I see you have been trying to add POV to New Canaan, Connecticut, but please refrain from continuing to do so. Nationalparks 03:46, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I grew up in NC. You didn;t —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.9.141.171 (talk • contribs) .
- Either way, Wikipedia is NPOV. Nationalparks 15:02, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
The fact is Coulter is a whack job should not be contested by a rational person — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.9.141.171 (talk • contribs)
Please also refrain from adding POV commentary to bios of Joe Lieberman, Chris Murphy, Nancy Johnson, Ned Lamont, and any others. --Francisx 00:40, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
Sorry if my facts arent from Move On HQ. If you can point to any factual errors, please do so. My suspicion is your response will reflect a liberal POV, not a NPOV —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.9.141.171 (talk • contribs) .
For example. I added Murphy is running for Congress and listed the potential successors to his seat. Why is that an NPOV? Because it does not promote Murphy's campaign? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.9.141.171 (talk • contribs) .
- You don't seem to understand that this is an encyclopedia, not a forum for polemic. The fact that the majority of your posts are reverted suggests that I'm not the only one who feels this way. You need to source arguments, stay on topic, and avoid POV editorializing in articles. Otherwise, I will nominate your IP for blocking.--Francisx 18:31, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
And you think you should be able to post MoveOn press releases as NPOV??????....the hyposcrisy is thicker than London Fog here!
NPOV
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. You may also be interested in reading The five pillars of Wikipedia, our Help pages, the Tutorial, the policy on citing sources, and our Manual of Style.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~
); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
Nationalparks 19:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
If you folks want to put some bytes behind the bark please look at the John Rowland article and tell me why it so lame
Joe Lieberman
Per WP:BLP, please do not add negative criticism about a living person without a verifiable reference. Negative criticism of a living person is not subject to 3RR, and will be reverted when inserted without a reference. Thanks, Sandy 22:43, 21 July 2006 (UTC) Thanks, I've been adding web links...obviously the CT e;ection is presently vvery fluid and am trying to keep folks up to date