Talk:Moonglow Records: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
{{WikiProject Record Labels| class = |importance= }} |
→SO, WHO OWNED MOONGLOW RECORDS?: new section |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Business & Economics|class=stub|importance=}} |
{{WikiProject Business & Economics|class=stub|importance=}} |
||
{{WikiProject Record Labels| class = |importance= }} |
{{WikiProject Record Labels| class = |importance= }} |
||
== SO, WHO OWNED MOONGLOW RECORDS? == |
|||
WHY DO PEOPLE WHO START A WIKI-ARTICLE AVOID THE OBVIOUS. IF IT'S ABOUT A PERSON THEN THE ARTICLE SHOULD INCLUDE THE DATE OF BIRTH AND DATE OF DEATH, IF APPLICABLE. IF THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT A RECORD LABEL THEN OBVIOUSLY THE OWNER(s) OF THE LABEL IS PARAMOUNT. IT WOULD BE NICE TO MENTION THE ARTIST(s) AND THE HITS, IF THERE WERE ANY. [[Special:Contributions/184.76.56.97|184.76.56.97]] ([[User talk:184.76.56.97|talk]]) 10:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)JSJR 07192015 |
Revision as of 10:51, 19 July 2015
![]() | Business Stub‑class | |||||||||
|
![]() | Record Labels Unassessed | |||||||||
|
SO, WHO OWNED MOONGLOW RECORDS?
WHY DO PEOPLE WHO START A WIKI-ARTICLE AVOID THE OBVIOUS. IF IT'S ABOUT A PERSON THEN THE ARTICLE SHOULD INCLUDE THE DATE OF BIRTH AND DATE OF DEATH, IF APPLICABLE. IF THE ARTICLE IS ABOUT A RECORD LABEL THEN OBVIOUSLY THE OWNER(s) OF THE LABEL IS PARAMOUNT. IT WOULD BE NICE TO MENTION THE ARTIST(s) AND THE HITS, IF THERE WERE ANY. 184.76.56.97 (talk) 10:51, 19 July 2015 (UTC)JSJR 07192015