Jump to content

Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Treehouse: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 24: Line 24:
::::I didn't, I removed the fake logo you created from the talkpage. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 20:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
::::I didn't, I removed the fake logo you created from the talkpage. [[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 20:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


:::::You did delete my last comment and the project logo and then I had to put them both back and then you just continued to remove the logo. Me putting the projects logo on its own talk page is not vandalism yet you give me multiple vandalism notices for doing so out of spite. Your behavior is veering towards the out of hand area and if I recieve any more uncalled for warnings, I might have to request a block for you. You dont have to recognize this as a wikiproject but there is no reason to try to sabatoge it all because earlier on, I, a newbie bested you at policy.
:::::You did delete my last comment and the project logo and then I had to put them both back and then you just continued to remove the logo. Me putting the projects logo on its own talk page is not vandalism yet you give me multiple vandalism notices for doing so out of spite. Your behavior is veering towards the out of hand area and if I recieve any more uncalled for warnings, I might have to request a block for you. You dont have to recognize this as a wikiproject but there is no reason to try to sabatoge it all because earlier on, I, a newbie bested you at policy. [[User:Wikipenguin 8|Wikipenguin 8]] ([[User talk:Wikipenguin 8|talk]]) 20:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:32, 11 August 2015

Wikipedia:Treehouse (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

No encyclopedic value to this page, but I cannot find a valid criteria for speedy deletion for it. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:12, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It has the prefix "wikipedia" therefore, it does not need encyclopedic value. I am constructing a project page. Wikipenguin 8 (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
For what project? This project doesn't exist, and you cannot just make up a project because you feel like it. No evidence that this page benefits the encyclopedia in anyway. 19:17, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Yes the project doesnt exsist but I am creating it and yes I can, how else do projects come about. Wikipenguin 8 (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Here from policy, "... editors may start new WikiProjects at any time and are encouraged, but not obligated, to propose them before doing so." And these are the differences with the prefixes. As you can see, needing encyclopedic content only applies to namespace number 1. Mine is number 2.

1.Main namespace (no prefix): contains all encyclopedia articles, lists, disambiguation pages, and encyclopedia redirects. Sometimes referred to as "mainspace".

2.Wikipedia namespace or Project namespace (prefix Wikipedia:): contains many types of pages connected with the Wikipedia project itself: information, policy, essays, processes, discussion, etc..

Wikipenguin 8 (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A WikiProject name must start with WikiProject in it, also I don't see how a Wikiproject on Treehouses is useful. Also, this will only cause confusion with WP:Teahouse, an established organisation. Joseph2302 (talk) 19:27, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It doesnt matter if you think its useful or not! And the it can start with wikipedia as well. See Wikipedia:Teahouse will take you to the teahouse will it not. It also says above that wp wikiproject or wikipedia are all acceptable. And teahouse is not an established orginization, its just another project like the one im creating. Wikipenguin 8 User:Joseph2302 (talk) 19:31, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not delete the treehouses talk page comments that I made. Thanks Wikipenguin 8 (talk) 20:15, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't, I removed the fake logo you created from the talkpage. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:16, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You did delete my last comment and the project logo and then I had to put them both back and then you just continued to remove the logo. Me putting the projects logo on its own talk page is not vandalism yet you give me multiple vandalism notices for doing so out of spite. Your behavior is veering towards the out of hand area and if I recieve any more uncalled for warnings, I might have to request a block for you. You dont have to recognize this as a wikiproject but there is no reason to try to sabatoge it all because earlier on, I, a newbie bested you at policy. Wikipenguin 8 (talk) 20:32, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]