User talk:The Drover's Wife: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:The Drover's Wife/Archive 6) (bot |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 19:21, 12 October 2024
|
||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Neil McInnes
[edit]Hello,
Noticed you were quick to revert changes on the Neil McInnes article. I've moved the old page to Neil McInnes (politician), I know I'm not doing it properly by copying and pasting but frankly it makes no difference to the end product.
Don't worry, I will go through all the 'What links here' to redirect them to the Neil McInnes (politician).
Thanks!
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!
Recently declined articles
[edit]You recently declined my two articles, List of top 10 singles in 2018 (Australia) and List of top 10 albums in 2018 (Australia). You bring up some fair points but on your comment saying it was messy, both pages use nearly identical formats to the Billboard top 10 articles so why haven't those articles been declined for the same reasons? Bc654 1:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)
Isn't most of the information on my article verifiable on the "Radio Locator" & "FCC" databases? Aren't those databases independent of the station? I've looked extensively and have not found other references. I know that "similar" articles (which have been accepted) is not a valid argument, but if those other articles have been accepted in error, shouldn't they be deleted? talk
Draft: Rebekah Long
[edit]I'd like to ask what is considered "promotional tone" and exactly what is not "generic" mentions as the bluegrass unlimited was a feature article in a main stream magazine. She is prominent in Southern Gospel History and Bluegrass history as a wife of Ben Speer and a long lineage of bluegrass background as identical twin sister to Lizzy Long. Please be specific to what needs to be edited re "promotional tone" as everything written is biographical and informational. — Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.
(Undid revision 1037089668 by Wikiuser276 (talk) COI spam will not stand, sorry)
[edit]You have removed the substance of this article update on two occassions now and I am wondering why...
Considering the initial page is a one line wikipedia stub page which is completely out of date particularly with regard to the new position which this MP holds in the Queensland Parliament which is not reflected in the article.
You have said puffery/COI - however this article was factually written and backed up by sources. And provides a better sense of background then previously was available on wikipedia. Surely removing the full changes to the article is not productive to the inherent purposes of wikipedia.....
I have edited the article since in line with your comments, I believe it is neutrally written