User talk:Khukri

Archive Here

User:219.91.203.71

Clearing the issue

Hello, are u paid to edit wiki? how many $ per hour? Anyway, was not aware of the grave seriousness of the user page which is after all the users page! also, there was no explicit warning written on that message by Pifactorial!! Saw nothing wrong in deleting that. Was a little pissed off by the word vandalism. Further I am deleting both your "warnings" because I just now realize as a newbie that some people do take these things seriously even though most bi or multilateral issues are usually biased and routinely changed according to the POV of the dominant identity of the contributor, and as a newbie I can inform you, the guardian angel of wiki that I wont use my editing FUN (it was light hearted fun about how India kicked Paki ass after Pak attacked India in the first place, lol) on serious articles because people take this stuff a little too seriously!!! I do appreciate (more now) the efforts of people trying to seriously make wiki a place of serious integrity. Hope this clears this issue. Peace. And with that understanding I am cleaning off my user page to keep it as a clean clear page. Peace. Actually, this is the first time, just right now, I noticed these features and checked them out!!! Need to chill more. Anyway, bye. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.91.203.71 (talk • contribs)

Further

If I register now, what about earlier references to my IP? Will the user page and all the other stuff be clean and clear? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.91.203.71‎ (talk • contribs)

My response after the initial warning I gave, it's subsequent removal and to his/her comments above. [1]

Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 15:32, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

What nonsense you people perpetrate

Excuse me? What was racist about anything I posted especially about the Indo-Pak war???!!! Wiki should rein people like you in coz you are straining too much at the leashes. Maybe you should grow up a little, especially in the intellect department, to atleast identify what is racist and what isnt. Bye moron. And who gives WARNINGS to people like you and bans them for calling others racist and vandals? Maybe racists and vandals like you who are vandalizing peoples user pages should be banned!!! Power does make some people mad. Vandals like you should have their so called powers removed immediately for you to become sensible again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.91.203.71 (talk • contribs)

If you are going to leave any comments on a page and would like a serious discussion then could you sign your comments with ~~~~. You may disagree with what I have written, that is your perogative, but leave off the personal attacks and hissy fits, it will only get you blocked. Right, now lets have a look at some of your previous edits eh?

"Pakistan is a terrorist state worse than Afghanistan."

"Pakistan will never change its evil terrorist designs even after repeated humiliations at the hands of Indians."

"But USA and the world continue to overlook it because if the puppet lap dog dictator...."

"....were forced to run away by India along with severe scolding by Pakistani dogs master...."

Now in all honesty do these really look like a critical eye has been passed over the subject, do you not think they they have even the slightest hint of POV?

Having looked at what you have written here and in some of your later edits shows you can write coherently. I know these edits were a few weeks ago, and you have since given worthwhile contributions but this all stemmed from removal of warnings on your talk page. Please remember Wikipedia tries to represent a global perspective, not just an Indian one. If you wish to seriously add this rhetoric to an article, discuss it on the relevant talk pages and achieve consensus but don't just go charging in adding what you think is right to the article please. Rgds Khukri ^{(talk . contribs)} 00:06, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

(empty heading)

my older sister thought it would be funny to frick up the pages when i went to go use the bathroom and take a shower SORRY — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.26.93.96 (talk • contribs)

Vagina

The message you sent regarding vagina was in fact sent from a proxy . We are at a university .. and hence many users have a common ip ,, or maybe it is dynamic.. However messaging to this ip doesn't ensure that the message is recieved by the concerned vandal , as there are as many as 5000 students in the university..

I too strongly condemn the act of amking such nonsensical changes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.197.115.38 (talk • contribs)

Pliopithecus

Hello Khukri,

I see you reverted by edit on the Pliopithecus page, however I have two sources stating that the family Pliopithecidae does indeed belong in the superfamily Hominoidea. First is the Marshall Illustrated Encyclopedia of Dinosaurs and Prehistoric Animals by Dr. Douglas Palmer and Prof. Barry Cox (ISBN 3-8290-6747-X), a very good encyclopedia on prehistoric vertebrates. Next is the Paleobiology Database[2]. This database is edited by university professors and institutions, mostly from the University of California (Santa Barbara), and also pretty up-to-date (there is already a Tiktaalik entry[3] while this creature's discovery and description were announced publically in April 2006).

I was going to ask you why you called my edit an 'experiment', but your second message cleared that up. No hard feelings! Jerkov 20:43, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

It's not a joke, but it was incorrect anyways. - UtherSRG (talk) 20:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Slight reprieve

I guess that's the one problem with having super-vigilant/super-fast editors/admins/bots looking out for vandals. If someone truly vandalizes by accident, they are not given much of a chance to revert their own edits (I think both of our reverts on that kid came < 10 seconds after the offensive edits!) Seidenstud 00:49, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Reporting User:TomPhil

I assume this was a mistake, so I removed it from the WP:AIV. If I am wrong, please feel free to readd him. --Porqin 11:37, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you very much for the revert on my userpage. :) Regards -- Banes 16:06, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Poor Show

There was no nonsense uttered. Pure fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.240.139.255 (talk • contribs)

Per 219.91.203.71

I've actually been keeping track of your correspondence. He's definitely been troublesome, but I'm holding out hope that he's not unintelligent, but simply misinformed. I posted him a comment trying to explain the situation. If this keeps up much longer, we're going to have to take further action to put an end to it once and for all. --π! 19:12, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

Uh.

I can't clear my own old discussion? Thanks for being on top of things with good ol' 69.250.94.172...

The message from Richard Cavell is NOT AN OFFICIAL WARNING, it is a DISCUSSION WITH A WIKIPEDIA MEMBER and I believe I am within my rights to edit it. Please advise if I am not -- the unrelated warning below it remains. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.94.172 (talk • contribs)

A Thank you

Don't mention the counter vandalism. Just got Vandal Fighter today and noticed you were a hotbed... take care. Galactor213 23:36, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

Tiger Smith

Hi, just a quick question: why did you revert this edit? Seems to be perfectly sensible to me (the IP editor changed the debut and last dates because they were wrong). Sam Vimes 15:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

No probs! Just be a bit more careful with that program, it's powerful ;) Sam Vimes 15:31, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

71.224.24.99 16:46, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

That's ok, I know him.

Wolfn...

It was a joke! Plus, how do you know it's not true, and I actually know it to be true? Please put back my changes, I did not vandalize.