Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Anthropology/archive1: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 21:25, 5 August 2006

Anthropology

Very good article. Meets all Featured Article criteria. --GoOdCoNtEnT 06:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Support - per nom - --GoOdCoNtEnT 06:35, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Why are you weakly supporting nominatons? Shouldn't you be giving full support to articles you nominate? — Deckill e r 06:46, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I want others to have a stronger deciding role in whether this article should be featured or not. --GoOdCoNtEnT 07:10, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: lead definately needs to be expanded. 216.58.91.187 16:18, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not place more than one nomination at a time — this makes it difficult to do each article and its objections justice. Zzzzz 16:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. A few quick observations show this is not a featured article right now. It is nice Jeronimo 21:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Lead is too short.
- Lack of inline citations.
- Unannotated list of "fields and subfields"
- Sections dedicated to the USA, France, Britain and "after World War II" indicate poor structure and/or incomplete coverage of the topic.

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 '''Please do not place more than one nomination at a time — this makes it difficult to do each article and its objections justice.''' [[User:Zzzzz|Zzzzz]] 16:27, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
+* '''Object'''. A few quick observations show this is not a featured article right now. It is nice [[User:Jeronimo|Jeronimo]] 21:25, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
+** Lead is too short.
+** Lack of inline citations.
+** Unannotated list of "fields and subfields"
+** Sections dedicated to the USA, France, Britain and "after World War II" indicate poor structure and/or incomplete coverage of the topic.