Jump to content

Talk:Hyaenodontidae: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 71.199.98.16 - "→‎Conflicting Information: "
Line 6: Line 6:
The article for ''[[Dissopsalis]]'' says that that genus lasted into the Pliocene, but this article says that the last Hyaenodontid died out during the Miocene. So, which article needs to be amended?--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 04:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
The article for ''[[Dissopsalis]]'' says that that genus lasted into the Pliocene, but this article says that the last Hyaenodontid died out during the Miocene. So, which article needs to be amended?--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 04:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)


The referral of ''Kelba'' to Afrotheria does not mean that all hyaenodontids are Afrotheria. Not one of the published and cited sources supports placing all hyaenodontids anywhere but within the creodonts. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.199.98.16|71.199.98.16]] ([[User talk:71.199.98.16|talk]]) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
The referral of ''Kelba'' to Afrotheria does not mean that all hyaenodontids are Afrotheria. Not one of the published and cited sources supports placing all hyaenodontids anywhere but within the creodonts. Nor do any of the abstracts cited mention anything about this. Unless someone can provide a published sources, it's clear that this does not have any place here. <small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.199.98.16|71.199.98.16]] ([[User talk:71.199.98.16|talk]]) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

Revision as of 15:12, 13 September 2015

WikiProject iconMammals Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconPalaeontology Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.


Conflicting Information

The article for Dissopsalis says that that genus lasted into the Pliocene, but this article says that the last Hyaenodontid died out during the Miocene. So, which article needs to be amended?--Mr Fink (talk) 04:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The referral of Kelba to Afrotheria does not mean that all hyaenodontids are Afrotheria. Not one of the published and cited sources supports placing all hyaenodontids anywhere but within the creodonts. Nor do any of the abstracts cited mention anything about this. Unless someone can provide a published sources, it's clear that this does not have any place here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.199.98.16 (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]