Talk:Hyaenodontidae: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 71.199.98.16 - "→Conflicting Information: " |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
The article for ''[[Dissopsalis]]'' says that that genus lasted into the Pliocene, but this article says that the last Hyaenodontid died out during the Miocene. So, which article needs to be amended?--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 04:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
The article for ''[[Dissopsalis]]'' says that that genus lasted into the Pliocene, but this article says that the last Hyaenodontid died out during the Miocene. So, which article needs to be amended?--[[User:Apokryltaros|Mr Fink]] ([[User talk:Apokryltaros|talk]]) 04:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC) |
||
The referral of ''Kelba'' to Afrotheria does not mean that all hyaenodontids are Afrotheria. Not one of the published and cited sources supports placing all hyaenodontids anywhere but within the creodonts. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.199.98.16|71.199.98.16]] ([[User talk:71.199.98.16|talk]]) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
The referral of ''Kelba'' to Afrotheria does not mean that all hyaenodontids are Afrotheria. Not one of the published and cited sources supports placing all hyaenodontids anywhere but within the creodonts. Nor do any of the abstracts cited mention anything about this. Unless someone can provide a published sources, it's clear that this does not have any place here. <small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.199.98.16|71.199.98.16]] ([[User talk:71.199.98.16|talk]]) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
Revision as of 15:12, 13 September 2015
![]() | Mammals Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
![]() | Palaeontology Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Conflicting Information
The article for Dissopsalis says that that genus lasted into the Pliocene, but this article says that the last Hyaenodontid died out during the Miocene. So, which article needs to be amended?--Mr Fink (talk) 04:02, 8 December 2007 (UTC)
The referral of Kelba to Afrotheria does not mean that all hyaenodontids are Afrotheria. Not one of the published and cited sources supports placing all hyaenodontids anywhere but within the creodonts. Nor do any of the abstracts cited mention anything about this. Unless someone can provide a published sources, it's clear that this does not have any place here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.199.98.16 (talk) 15:06, 13 September 2015 (UTC)