Template talk:Wind power in the United States: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Wikipedia:Verifiability |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
Does not meet [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]. Changes remain inconsistent with cited reference. As other sources group states differently this arbitrary choice is better left out.[[User:Djflem|Djflem]] ([[User talk:Djflem|talk]]) 06:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
Does not meet [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]]. Changes remain inconsistent with cited reference. As other sources group states differently this arbitrary choice is better left out.[[User:Djflem|Djflem]] ([[User talk:Djflem|talk]]) 06:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
||
:Groupings like this in templates do not have to be 'verifiable'. --[[Special:Contributions/74.38.77.101|74.38.77.101]] ([[User talk:74.38.77.101|talk]]) 19:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:11, 13 September 2015
United States Template‑class | |||||||
|
Divison by region
No reference given for regional divisions, Berkeley mentioned but does correspond to changes made: http://emp.lbl.gov/sites/all/files/lbnl-188167.pdf divides regions completely differently. Djflem (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes it was based on the 2014 wind tech. market report. But I had made several mistakes. Namely
- West Va and Maryland were in Northeast instead of southwest and
- Interior was labelled Central Plains.
I also had combined Great Plains and Northeast. Since Alaska and Hawaii were not included on the map in the report, I combined them with the West region and labelled it West and Pacific. --74.38.77.101 (talk) 23:43, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Does not meet Wikipedia:Verifiability. Changes remain inconsistent with cited reference. As other sources group states differently this arbitrary choice is better left out.Djflem (talk) 06:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Groupings like this in templates do not have to be 'verifiable'. --74.38.77.101 (talk) 19:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)