Talk:Sudbury school: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Aaronwinborn (talk | contribs) →External links and See also: removing external links for now |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
::I do not think this is an absolutely necessary addition, but I put it out there so that the possibility will be considered and discussed. At any rate, if an external link to the SVS website is here, we should probably also include an internal link to the article about SVS. [[User:Michael%Sappir|Michael Sappir]] <small>• </small> ([[User_talk:Michael%Sappir|Talk]]) 14:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
::I do not think this is an absolutely necessary addition, but I put it out there so that the possibility will be considered and discussed. At any rate, if an external link to the SVS website is here, we should probably also include an internal link to the article about SVS. [[User:Michael%Sappir|Michael Sappir]] <small>• </small> ([[User_talk:Michael%Sappir|Talk]]) 14:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
:::That's a good idea. I did a quick search on google, and didn't find any articles about the model that weren't specifically hosted on a Subury school's web site. So for now, considering there's now an internal link to Sudbury Valley School, I'll remove the external link to that school. It makes more sense to add links to articles ''discussing'' the model. I just don't know of any good, ''neutral'' links off-hand. Of course, the best source may be hosted on a sudbury school's site; I just don't want to arbitrarily pick one or two over any others. Probably the best for now would be something right off of sudval.org's website, since they are at least the original sudbury school. -- [[User:Aaronwinborn|Aaronwinborn]] 21:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC) |
:::That's a good idea. I did a quick search on google, and didn't find any articles about the model that weren't specifically hosted on a Subury school's web site. So for now, considering there's now an internal link to Sudbury Valley School, I'll remove the external link to that school. It makes more sense to add links to articles ''discussing'' the model. I just don't know of any good, ''neutral'' links off-hand. Of course, the best source may be hosted on a sudbury school's site; I just don't want to arbitrarily pick one or two over any others. Probably the best for now would be something right off of sudval.org's website, since they are at least the original sudbury school. -- [[User:Aaronwinborn|Aaronwinborn]] 21:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC) |
||
My main confusion over this page is why it is under "sudbury school" and not directly linked to under "sudbury model" where it seems, it would belong. One vote to move it over. Any disagreement? [[User:ZuG|ZuG]] 14:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:21, 9 August 2006
Module:WikiProject banner/doc
This page is a soft redirect.
 | This template has been replaced by Module:WikiProject banner |
Any problems with this model of school? - AmishThrasher 14:14, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
- Not as widespread as it should be. ;) Michael%Sappir 18:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
External links and See also
I have removed the recently added links to Katuah Sudbury School's website. There are quite a few Sudbury schools with websites not linked to at the bottom of this article. I'm frankly unsure even SVS's website should be linked to here. Maybe the external links area for this article should only contain links to external articles about the model. Meanwhile, it would at least make sense not to add links to just any other school's website (or list of Sudbury schools) unless there is some good reason for that. If there is such a reason for the inclusion of the Katuah links then by all means, tell me off. Meanwhile, a general idea for this section should be discussed. Michael Sappir • (Talk) 19:07, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
- I agree that we do not need to have lists to other schools' websites at this article, considering the aforementioned list. If nothing else, it would just unnecessarily lengthen the article. I'm neutral about the inclusion of the Sudbury Valley School's web site, except that it serves as a reference point. Aaronwinborn 13:46, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- As an afterthought, I've added a See also section, with the following links:
- I do not think this is an absolutely necessary addition, but I put it out there so that the possibility will be considered and discussed. At any rate, if an external link to the SVS website is here, we should probably also include an internal link to the article about SVS. Michael Sappir • (Talk) 14:12, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
- That's a good idea. I did a quick search on google, and didn't find any articles about the model that weren't specifically hosted on a Subury school's web site. So for now, considering there's now an internal link to Sudbury Valley School, I'll remove the external link to that school. It makes more sense to add links to articles discussing the model. I just don't know of any good, neutral links off-hand. Of course, the best source may be hosted on a sudbury school's site; I just don't want to arbitrarily pick one or two over any others. Probably the best for now would be something right off of sudval.org's website, since they are at least the original sudbury school. -- Aaronwinborn 21:08, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
My main confusion over this page is why it is under "sudbury school" and not directly linked to under "sudbury model" where it seems, it would belong. One vote to move it over. Any disagreement? ZuG 14:21, 9 August 2006 (UTC)