User talk:Thewolfchild: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 22:49, 24 November 2015

Note: If I made a comment on your talk page, or replied to you on an article talk page - Please reply there, not here. Thanks. - Wolf

"I'm thewolfchild, girl
Howlin' for you
Wild flower..."

- The Cult

Blocked

Enough of this behavior. Personal attacks are incendiary and you keep trying to push beyond the boundaries.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 18:16, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think a week is necessary. Yes, I made one edit summary comment that could be construed as an insult, but could also be construed as a fact. It was made in the face multiple, ongoing attacks and insults by the editor I had replied to ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]). That same editor also only received a week. There is a disparity in the punishment being handed out here. But I don't really expect any different from the admins here lately. - ^theWOLFchild 20:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thewolfchild. I've been watching your edits since the day you registered. You started with a block, and an "ok, bud, you wait till the block is done and we'll have it out" sort of thing. An admin talked to you and helped you understand how things work here. Then you were fine, for ages. You are a good editor but are slipping back into that. Please choose the best path for yourself. Your aim is to have articles the way you think they should best be. So, play cleverly. Vinegar is self-poison. Honey, more honey, manners, reason, discussion and more honey, those get you what you want. Please try, okay? We need you. Please don't go astray and end up getting booted off the project. Please?

Oh, and good news: If you are dealing with a rude editor, then your strategy is honey. No better way to get rid of an enemy than to sit pretty and make contrast. You are nice, he is nasty, all eyes are on him. He ends up in peril, not you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 :I don't think a week is necessary. Yes, I made '''one''' edit summary comment that could be construed as an insult, but could also be construed as a fact. It was made in the face multiple, ongoing attacks and insults by the editor I had replied to ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MSGJ&oldid=prev&diff=692199353], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:MSGJ&diff=692284134&oldid=692244803], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SchroCat&oldid=prev&diff=692133539], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassianto&diff=prev&oldid=692211048], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassianto&diff=692282884&oldid=692247557], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cassianto&diff=prev&oldid=691390472]). That same editor also only received a week. There is a disparity in the punishment being handed out here. But I don't really expect any different from the admins here lately. -  ''[[User: Thewolfchild|<sup>the</sup>'''<big><em style="font-family:Matisse itc;color:red">WOLF</em></big>'''<small>child</small>]]'' 20:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
+Hello, Thewolfchild. I've been watching your edits since the day you registered. You started with a block, and an "ok, bud, you wait till the block is done and we'll have it out" sort of thing. An admin talked to you and helped you understand how things work here. Then you were fine, for ages. You are a good editor but are slipping back into that. Please choose the best path for yourself. Your aim is to have articles the way you think they should best be. So, play cleverly. Vinegar is self-poison. Honey, more honey, manners, reason, discussion and more honey, those get you what you want. Please try, okay? We need you. Please don't go astray and end up getting booted off the project. Please?
+Oh, and good news: If you are dealing with a rude editor, then your strategy is honey. No better way to get rid of an enemy than to sit pretty and make contrast. You are nice, he is nasty, all eyes are on him. He ends up in peril, not you. [[User:Anna Frodesiak|Anna Frodesiak]] ([[User talk:Anna Frodesiak|talk]]) 22:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)