User talk:73.219.217.243

User talk:John from Idegon#Disrespect and antagonism on the Windham NH article

WP:Civil. Name calling does not become you. Please comment on the edits, not the editor. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:28, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (50.136.96.164) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:10, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Windham, New Hampshire

A discussion that you might be interested in contributing to is ongoing. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:14, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

User talk:John from Idegon

Please don't restore message's on User talk:John from Idegon. He's allowed to manage his page--including removing unwanted messages--as he sees fit. Sarah 09:00, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

". 7&6=thirteen (☎) 12:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Actually, madame, according to the most essential principle behind a community-based Wiki, he has no more right to edit the page than any other user does, and his persistent violation of Wikipedia's code of conduct (WP:Civil) by name calling (e.g. "elistic prick") and profane language (e.g. "don't give flying fuck") is both disturbing and relevant for discussion on his page. I will restore the discourse if I see he has cowardly removed it again, and I will persist in my attempts to see that he takes accountability for violating Wikipedia's terms and being a bellicose, immature internet troll. Surely you must not respect an anonymous internet user who insults others with profane language and then tries to cover it up. It is shocking that you've spent your time reprimanding me in the defense of a veritable internet troll, and I shall be highly disturbed if you continue to support such an individual. 73.219.217.243 (talk) 12:51, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Furthermore, madame, it is rather shocking that your comments would so outrightly violate that which stated in WP:Own. Your statement that he is allowed to manage a page is valid, however your insinuation that I do not have the same right in the sense that his talk page somehow belongs to him quite clearly constitutes a stark ignorance of the WP:Ownership of content. 73.219.217.243 (talk) 13:02, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

You are terribly confused. Please see WP:OWNTALK, specifically:"users may freely remove comments from their own talk pages". He is allowed to remove unwanted messages from his own talk page and you are not allowed to edit war over it with him or other editors or admins. I don't know what your dispute is with John and I have had my own issues with him in the past, so I am not biased in his favor, but I have absolutely no issue with blocking you if you continue harassing him. Sarah 00:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

User "John from Idegon"'s Disrespect and antagonism on the Windham NH article (reproduced from his talk page, from which he cowardly deleted the following)

John - (i.e., stranger from the sad Pacific Northwest)

I must call out your disrespectful and belligerent antics which have continued on the Windham, NH article (a place you've never been nor about which you have the slightest qualification of being a knowledgeable person). You resorted to profane, ad-hominem attacks on another Wikipedian: "I dont give a flying &%$# about your town", denigrating the editor on the basis of his town, disrespecting our town, and flagrantly demonstrating your sickening, haughty insolence. This conduct is absolutely unbecoming of a Wikipedian. If you don't "give a flying ****" about the town (which is, by far, more significant and important than any of your deserted wanderings throughout the forgotten back-door of America - in "Idegon"), why do you insist on presenting yourself as such an authority on the page? You do seem to get quite a sense of satisfaction from this facade of authority you create for yourself. It was evident to me a few weeks ago when I took issue to your causeless, inconsistent, and inaccurate removal of the "affluent" modifier from the opening sentence - which other users also decried. John, you clearly have some issues. Please take them elsewhere and decease using unprofessional, hurtful, vitriolic, and inappropriate language against Wikipedia users. And while that individual's addition may not have been encyclopedic content, your wanton, indeterminate, and maniacal occupation of the Windham article has been quite a laughing matter of late. Perhaps you could find a town closer to home to obsess on, the inhabitants of which to launch your profane verbal attacks?

73.219.217.243 (talk) 11:27, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Wow, I am so sorry. I'll move to someplace your nameless ass finds more suitable tomorrow, you east coast elitist prick. I will edit whatever articles I choose, and you have nothing whatsoever to say about it. And I don't give a flying fuck about your opinion of that either. Have a wonderful day. John from Idegon (talk) 11:35, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

John, your clear interpersonal disabilities and continued, outright violation of Wikipedia's code of conduct (WP:Civil) speak volumes to your childish obsession with our town, its besieged article, and your belligerent persistence in ad-hominem, profane attacks (e.g. "you east coast elitist prick", "I don't give a flying fuck", etc.). I am thankful that your culpability and aggression are as publicly evident as you've made them. 73.219.217.243 (talk) 05:42, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

WP:Civil and WP:User page

Please read and apply. WP:Bait would also apply. So too, WP:Dead horse. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:03, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:19, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Kudpung, as I stated on your talk page, your act above represents an unfathomable contortion of reality in which I am the executor of verbal harassment, instead of the victim. The established editor of your Wiki "John from Idegon" - an incontestable internet troll - as called me "an elistic prick", and made clear he does not give a "flying fuck" about my town. You were quite confused when assigning the recipient of your warning and I exhort you to revert your action and give the troll the warning, or else everyone who reads this will be able to witness first hand the unfairness with which the Wikipedia administrators collude themselves against potential newcoming contributors. 73.219.217.243 (talk) 13:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

• This seems like a case of WP:IDHT. I am not involved in your content disputes. I am merely concerned with your interaction with other users. If you then feel you have been unjustly treated for having restarted long dead issues, baiting and harassing of other editors, and leaving your your characteristic offensive comments everywhere, then you are more than welcome to escalate my admin actions to a higher authority. Anonymous editors are not accorded more privileges than registered users. One more of your abusive diatribes anywhere and you will be blocked without further warning. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:20, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Kudpung, thank you for confirming that you are a despotic and unfair aggressor against a victim of verbal abuse. Anyone reading this can easily view the "abusive diatribes" of John from Idegon against me, calling me an "elistic prick", whereas I have only responded to such abusive diatribes. Kudpung - it is sickening that you have falsely accused me of having conducted an abusive diatribe, and you failed to point out one instance in which I harassed another editor. I did not "restart" any issue. Please substantiate your accusations with facts, not mindless and inaccurate fabrications designed to appease your editor friend. I have been called an "elistic prick" by your troll-friend John, and your response above is an abusive and sickening diatribe against an innocent casual user of WP who is now utterly disgraced by the site's internal administration. As you have confirmed that calling others an "elitist prick" is acceptable, by failing to warn John, it seems I may say the same to you. I demand an explanation for your abusive and inconsistent behaviour towards me. 73.219.217.243 (talk) 02:26, 5 December 2015 (UTC)