Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx

Padmalakshmisx

Padmalakshmisx (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Padmalakshmisx/Archive.

29 November 2015

– An SPI clerk has endorsed a request for CheckUser. A checkuser will shortly review the case.

Suspected sockpuppets

• Pravbv (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
• User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
• Editor interaction utility

He shows many of Padma's barely concealed traits: disruptive editing style, rude attitude, bombarding talk pages with multiple sections, all beginning in small-case letters and him being familiar with Wikipedia despite his account being created this year. He will certainly confess. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:40, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

An obvious WP:DUCK case. One can check my talk page's history to understand it better. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 14:00, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

A series of attacks by Prabvb on Pavan's page which have since been removed by User:Ssven2. His language in them and his communicating style is strongly similar to that of Padma's, especially the fact that he accuses me of POV pushing, which is actually what he does. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:43, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Anthimpag (Padma's sock blocked in February 2015) : "Kailash you please go on file SPI's daily on other users and dont contribute to wikipedia, but please waste your time on filing SPI's. I think you are obsessed with padmalakshmisx and soon need a psychiatrist" (source: contributions) and a message by Pravbv reads "dont waste your time, internet, and man hours on sock puppet investigations, no one is interested in SPI investigations now-a-days, unsourced content cannot be accepted" (source: Kailash29792's talk page). This is something suspicious. Also the way these two communicate are very similar to that of Padmalakshmisx and his previous socks. Pavanjandhyala (talk) 13:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

I am not a sock puppet, user Kailash has the habit of tagging every other editor he encounters as a sock puppet of padmalakshmisx. On the other hand, sock puppet allegations have to be made on some one, if he is into damaging wikipedia articles, but I am actually contributing to wikipedia constructively. Kindly check my edit history, and see what exactly I did. Pravbv (talk) 07:00, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

•  Additional information needed - @Kailash29792: In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:

1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:20, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

•  Clerk endorsed - Can we use the data from the July check to compare Pravbv to previous socks. His edits are very similar, but I'm not 100% sure. Vanjagenije (talk) 23:15, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

---