Jump to content

User talk:H1N111: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
H1N111 (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
H1N111 (talk | contribs)
Replaced content with ' {{unblock|reason=''The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja''}}'
Line 1: Line 1:
== Edit warring at [[White Latin American]] ==


<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> [[File:Stop x nuvola with clock.svg|40px|left|alt=Stop icon with clock]] You have been '''[[WP:Blocking policy|blocked]]''' from editing for a period of '''24 hours''' for [[WP:Edit warring|edit warring]]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to [[WP:Five pillars|make useful contributions]]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may [[WP:Appealing a block|appeal this block]] by first reading the [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]], then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;''}}.<p>During a dispute, you should first try to [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|discuss controversial changes]] and seek [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]]. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request [[Wikipedia:Page protection|page protection]]. </p></div><!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> The full report is at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User: H1N111 reported by User:Bleckter (Result: Blocked)]]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 01:42, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

== December 2015 ==
[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:White Latin Americans]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].

'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.{{Break}}''<br>You have been asked to take your content changes to the article's talk page and follow [[WP:BRD]]. A section specifically dealing with your changes was opened in November, but you've as yet to engage with other editors there.''<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 22:01, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to [[:Talk:White Latin Americans]] while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your [[IP address]], which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's [[Wikipedia:Sock puppetry|policy on multiple accounts]] usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. <!-- Template:Uw-login --> [[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 22:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

== Complaint about your edits at [[White Latin Americans]] ==

{{unblock reviewed | 1=I ask the opinion of a neutral librarian of mi block, and if there is a relationship between bleckter and EdJohnston against me, because this librarian is very supportive to Bleckter, and also, the user blekter, being just a new user, he went immediately with EdJohnston against me, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Bleckter as can be seen in his history], after that the user bleckter accuse me and leave their contributions, he not continued to edit since 6 September and today is 8, the block that the librarian EdJohnston put me, is unjustified, because the reason for the proposal to my block, it was because insulting to another user and performing edit war, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:EdJohnston/Archive_38#Attacks_and_blanked_user_talk That I already explain too many times to EdJohnston, why I reversed the editing of Bleckter], and I put it on the talk page, as he indicated me, but neither he nor the bleckter user, no one put his ideas, [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:White_Latin_Americans#References_in_Argentina_and_Costa_Rica the discussion is still unanswered], I promised not insult again the user and and until today, I have not talk to bleckter, also I promised not make a war on page editing white latin american, all that the librarian EdJohnston demanded me, but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=694013641#User:_H1N111_reported_by_User:Bleckter_.28Result:_Indef.29 he responded with a blockade], but unjustified, since I already did not follow either kept making insulting and edit wars, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring&oldid=694013641#User:_H1N111_reported_by_User:Bleckter_.28Result:_Indef.29 the librarian EdJohnston accused me of insulting the user blecker again], but also is misplaced, because [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_Latin_Americans&diff=prev&oldid=693602622 this insult is November 3], and the proposal was 6 , something strange is happening here and clearly that is against me, Cheers. --[[User:H1N111|H1N111]] ([[User talk:H1N111#top|talk]]) 18:34, 8 December 2015 (UTC) | decline = You have blatantly continued your battlefield approach to edit warring and have blatantly continued to insult your opponent - and it was during the last few days, and did not end in early November. If you genuinely cannot see that, then I really don't see how unblocking you would be a good idea. [[User:Boing! said Zebedee|Boing! said Zebedee]] ([[User talk:Boing! said Zebedee|talk]]) 19:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)}}


{{unblock|reason=''The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja''}}
{{unblock|reason=''The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja''}}

Revision as of 18:09, 18 December 2015


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

H1N111 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=''The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja'' |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=''The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja'' |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=''The Bitch mother who bore them all muajaja'' |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}