User talk:173.55.55.190: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:07, 4 January 2016

October 2015

Hello, I'm Milonica. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ḾỊḼʘɴίcả • Talk • _{I DX for fun!} 02:37, 12 October 2015 (UTC) [reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Addition of unsourced material at Steven Avery

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Steven Avery. Thank you. 32.218.152.138 (talk) 03:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Steven Avery

Your recent editing history at Steven Avery shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 32.218.152.138 (talk) 04:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 [[File:Information orange.svg|25px|alt=Information icon]] Please do not add unreferenced or [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|poorly referenced]] information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about [[Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons|living (or recently deceased) persons]], as you did to [[:Steven Avery]]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-biog2 --> [[Special:Contributions/32.218.152.138|32.218.152.138]] ([[User talk:32.218.152.138|talk]]) 03:47, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
+== Edit warring at [[Steven Avery]] ==
+[[File:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|left|alt=Stop icon]] Your recent editing history at [[:Steven Avery]] shows that you are currently engaged in an [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit war]]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to work toward making a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See [[Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle|BRD]] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]].  In some cases, you may wish to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]].
+'''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked from editing]]'''&mdash;especially if you violate the [[Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule|three-revert rule]], which states that an editor must not perform more than three [[Help:Reverting|reverts]] on a single page within a 24-hour period.  Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert.  Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> [[Special:Contributions/32.218.152.138|32.218.152.138]] ([[User talk:32.218.152.138|talk]]) 04:07, 4 January 2016 (UTC)