Jump to content

User talk:Codeine: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Codeine (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The former contribution was not vandalism, you are the vandal, arrogantly removing contributions without a thought.
==[[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome]] to the [[Wikipedia]]==
==[[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|Welcome]] to the [[Wikipedia]]==
Welcome, {{PAGENAME}}!
Welcome, {{PAGENAME}}!

Revision as of 15:04, 15 August 2006

The former contribution was not vandalism, you are the vandal, arrogantly removing contributions without a thought.

Welcome, Codeine!

Here are some useful tips to ease you into the Wikipedia experience:

Also, here are some odds and ends that I find useful from time to time:

Feel free to ask me anything the links and talk pages don't answer. You can most easily reach me by posting on my talk page.

You can sign your name on any page by typing 4 tildes, likes this: ~~~~.

Best of luck, and have fun!

ClockworkSoul 08:05, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

And now for something completely different

Ah, yes, Codeine. My good friend Flammable has mentioned you. Welcome to our fair encyclopedia. – ClockworkSoul 08:05, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks. And I see my reputation precedes me. Not sure whether that's a good or bad thing :-). Actually, I've been hovering around WP for a while, but I figured it was time I did something worthwhile other than creating blatant lies over at Uncyc. for a change :-) Codeine 23:28, 25 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

IRC Sucks

RRRR. PM doesn't work for me half the time. Just checking here to say thanks. I've done some anon edits on Uncyclopedia, but I should get more active over there, the people are alot cooler than on most wikis save for this one. karmafist 02:08, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandal

Vandal blocked. Cheers -- Szvest 13:33, 24 May 2006 (UTC) Wiki me up™[reply]


Codeine certainly has an odd idea of a non-neutral point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.118.177.9 (talkcontribs)

"Unless one is fully immersed in the Wikipedia mentality, this site is unlikely to amuse you in any real way". Can you please explain to me how this isn't contrary to WP:NPOV? Codeine 19:44, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Woo hoo, the wikipedia administrators, I'm shaking in my boots. You still have an odd idea of neutrality of point of view, you could leave the factual bit without just reverting everything. You seem to be a remarkably pompous little child. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.43.35.97 (talkcontribs)
I'm still waiting for you to explain how any of the content you have added is relevant to an encyclopedia entry about the site. I refer you again to WP:NPOV, Mindspillage's last revert and edit summary, and in light of your last message, also to WP:NPA. -- Codeine 16:18, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Can someone please ban this guy' certainly says a lot about your obsession with humour and parody. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.43.35.97 (talkcontribs)
You're vandalising the article, by repeatedly inserting anti-Uncyclopedia bias, in violation of WP:NPOV (whoa, dejá vu). If you dislike Uncyclopedia, don't visit it. If you dislike the fact that an online encyclopedia has no place for your subjective opinion regarding another site's content, start your own wiki. You could call it uncyclopediaistheworst.com, for example. -- Codeine 14:59, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]