User talk:Mimarx

This editor is a Registered Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge.

Who am I?

G'day, I'm ˥ Ǝ Ʉ H Ɔ I Ɯ At Oz.

Retired early due to spine/nerve related problems. But with still much to do in the virtual world.

I have a focus on technical/scientific matters in general. Was an IT Professional and try to keep up with its evolution. I also studied Psychology and Human Biology.

I also like to bring a cross cultural flavour to Wikipedia, and in particular, balance the seeming Americanisation of Wikipedia English. (flavour/flavor, Americanisation/ization... bloody spell checkers)

I also have interests in 3D modeling and related areas, 3D printers (own two) and the societal implications , I see great things in the future. I also contribute to the support of OpenSCAD, software for creating solid 2D/3D CAD models, give it a go if you have a programming background you should find it easy. P.S. Own a Dyson DC35/44 Animal - see a useful example of my 3D modelling here.

Also electronics, Arduino/Pi etc, making, hacking (in a good way - usually), DIY, manly power tools,scifi & geek-dom in general, beer and good red wine...

I also tend to rail at editors who are too swift to judge others. Hey, everybody has to have some flaw...

Italian food image

1. REDIRECT [here]

Hi, that's too technical for me!! On my computer, the image is perfectly situated within the subsection. I have no idea how to correct. Regards Denisarona (talk) 06:41, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

I have no objections to your amended layout - in fact, it is now as it was a month ago. Well done. Denisarona (talk) 05:08, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

We do not normally ...

Chemical formulas are viewed as routine. We don't cite references to justify them. Doing so would be equivalent to citng a reference for a number or citing a reference to justify spelling of a word. But have it your way. --Smokefoot (talk) 21:44, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Chemists such as User:Smokefoot and I (User:H Padleckas) consider the chemical structure of Oxalic acid to be well-established elementary information, which can be found in many books on chemistry or organic chemistry. There is nothing controversial or disputable about the chemical structure of oxalic acid. As such, we avoid cluttering up the page with needless references practically anybody could rather easily look up on their own. H Padleckas (talk) 23:04, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

However, if you still want a reference for the structure of oxalic acid, here's one below. You can put this one in yourself, if you like:

NIST-Oxalic acid .... H Padleckas (talk) 23:17, 10 January 2016 (UTC)