User talk:Calospaz

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Calospaz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made a case against user Alexbrn because he is not allowing any edits on the page "Functional medicine". The page, as it stands, needs a more neutral tone. I tried to work on this but he had my account deleted from Wikipedia. When I opened a case against him, I was accused of maliciously trying to tarnish Alexbrn's account, when all I was trying to do was to point out the bias tone of the article in question. I request that I may be allowed to edit articles once again, and that the article "Functional medicine" be reviewed for manipulative activity

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I made a case against user Alexbrn because he is not allowing any edits on the page "Functional medicine". The page, as it stands, needs a more neutral tone. I tried to work on this but he had my account deleted from Wikipedia. When I opened a case against him, I was accused of maliciously trying to tarnish Alexbrn's account, when all I was trying to do was to point out the bias tone of the article in question. I request that I may be allowed to edit articles once again, and that the article "Functional medicine" be reviewed for manipulative activity |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I made a case against user Alexbrn because he is not allowing any edits on the page "Functional medicine". The page, as it stands, needs a more neutral tone. I tried to work on this but he had my account deleted from Wikipedia. When I opened a case against him, I was accused of maliciously trying to tarnish Alexbrn's account, when all I was trying to do was to point out the bias tone of the article in question. I request that I may be allowed to edit articles once again, and that the article "Functional medicine" be reviewed for manipulative activity |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I made a case against user Alexbrn because he is not allowing any edits on the page "Functional medicine". The page, as it stands, needs a more neutral tone. I tried to work on this but he had my account deleted from Wikipedia. When I opened a case against him, I was accused of maliciously trying to tarnish Alexbrn's account, when all I was trying to do was to point out the bias tone of the article in question. I request that I may be allowed to edit articles once again, and that the article "Functional medicine" be reviewed for manipulative activity |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

January 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mark Arsten (talk) 23:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)