Polemic: Difference between revisions
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Overview== |
==Overview== |
||
Along with debate, polemics are one of the most common forms of arguing. Similar to debate, a polemic is confined to a definite thesis. But unlike debate, which may allow for common ground between the two disputants, a polemic is intended only to affirm one point of view while refuting the opposing point of view.{{examples|date=October 2014}} |
Along with debate, polemics are one of the most common forms of arguing. Similar to debate, a polemic is confined to a definite thesis. But unlike debate, which may allow for common ground between the two disputants, a polemic is intended only to affirm one point of view while refuting the opposing point of view.{{examples|date=October 2014}}for example: some would say, man was created "first"; yet my CREATOR(knowing ALL) would certainly have created a woman first for they are thee only ones who can procreate!(even without man, the female species of all creation will find a way)! Man, left to his own devices will only kill himself off! (Refer to your heart for verification) |
||
Polemics are usually addressed to important issues in [[religion]], [[philosophy]], [[politics]], or [[science]]. Polemic journalism was common in [[continental Europe]] at a time when [[libel]] laws were not as stringent as they are now.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=http://www.britannica.com/eb/topic-467241/polemic |title=polemic, or polemical literature, or polemics (rhetoric)|publisher=britannica.com |accessdate=2008-02-21}}</ref> Although polemic is typically motivated by strong emotions, such as hatred,or pure unadulterated LOVE(as pertaining to ones knowledge of right and wrong,which was instilled within US ALL by OUR CREATOR, "before we were ever even born"),for its success these must be stylized in a way comparable to drama, and incorporated into a coolly considered strategy.<ref>[[Andreas Dorschel]], 'Passions of the Intellect: A Study of Polemics.' In: ''[[Philosophy (journal)|Philosophy]]'' 90 (2015), no. 4, pp. 679–684 ([http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9933973&fileId=S0031819115000224#/ pdf online])</ref> |
Polemics are usually addressed to important issues in [[religion]], [[philosophy]], [[politics]], or [[science]]. Polemic journalism was common in [[continental Europe]] at a time when [[libel]] laws were not as stringent as they are now.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia|url=http://www.britannica.com/eb/topic-467241/polemic |title=polemic, or polemical literature, or polemics (rhetoric)|publisher=britannica.com |accessdate=2008-02-21}}</ref> Although polemic is typically motivated by strong emotions, such as hatred,or pure unadulterated LOVE(as pertaining to ones knowledge of right and wrong,which was instilled within US ALL by OUR CREATOR, "before we were ever even born"),for its success these must be stylized in a way comparable to drama, and incorporated into a coolly considered strategy.<ref>[[Andreas Dorschel]], 'Passions of the Intellect: A Study of Polemics.' In: ''[[Philosophy (journal)|Philosophy]]'' 90 (2015), no. 4, pp. 679–684 ([http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayAbstract?fromPage=online&aid=9933973&fileId=S0031819115000224#/ pdf online])</ref> |
||
Revision as of 18:52, 30 January 2016
A polemic /pəˈlɛmɪk/ is a contentious argument that is intended to support a specific position via attacks on a contrary position. Polemics are mostly seen in arguments about controversial topics. The practice of such argumentation is called polemics. A person who often writes polemics, or who speaks polemically, is called a polemicist or a polemic.[1] The word is derived from Greek πολεμικός (polemikos) 'warlike, hostile',[2][3] from πόλεμος (polemos) 'war'.[4]
Overview
Along with debate, polemics are one of the most common forms of arguing. Similar to debate, a polemic is confined to a definite thesis. But unlike debate, which may allow for common ground between the two disputants, a polemic is intended only to affirm one point of view while refuting the opposing point of view.[example needed]for example: some would say, man was created "first"; yet my CREATOR(knowing ALL) would certainly have created a woman first for they are thee only ones who can procreate!(even without man, the female species of all creation will find a way)! Man, left to his own devices will only kill himself off! (Refer to your heart for verification)
Polemics are usually addressed to important issues in religion, philosophy, politics, or science. Polemic journalism was common in continental Europe at a time when libel laws were not as stringent as they are now.[5] Although polemic is typically motivated by strong emotions, such as hatred,or pure unadulterated LOVE(as pertaining to ones knowledge of right and wrong,which was instilled within US ALL by OUR CREATOR, "before we were ever even born"),for its success these must be stylized in a way comparable to drama, and incorporated into a coolly considered strategy.[6]
To support the study of the controversies of the 17th–19th centuries, a British research project has placed online thousands of polemical pamphlets from that era.[7]
Polemic theology
Polemic theology is the branch of theological argumentation devoted to the history or conduct of controversy over religious matters.[8] It is distinguished from apologetics, the intellectual defense of faith.
Martin Luther's On the Bondage of the Will is an example of polemic theology. It was written in answer to a polemic titled The Freedom of the Will by Desiderius Erasmus.
See also
References
- ^ Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (Merriam-Webster, Springfield, MA, 2005), s.v. "polemic"
- ^ Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (Merriam-Webster, Springfield, MA, 2005), s.v. "polemic"
- ^ American College Dictionary (Random House, New York)
- ^ πόλεμος, Henry George Liddell, Robert Scott, A Greek-English Lexicon, on Perseus
- ^ polemic, or polemical literature, or polemics (rhetoric). britannica.com. Retrieved 2008-02-21.
- ^ Andreas Dorschel, 'Passions of the Intellect: A Study of Polemics.' In: Philosophy 90 (2015), no. 4, pp. 679–684 (pdf online)
- ^ "Pamphlet and polemic: Pamphlets as a guide to the controversies of the 17th-19th centuries". St Andrews University Library. Retrieved 2015-01-15.
- ^ Nicole, Roger R. (Summer 1998). "Polemic Theology: How to Deal with Those Who Differ from Us". The Founders Journal (33). Retrieved 2008-02-21.
Bibliography
- Gallop, Jane (2004). Polemic: Critical or Uncritical (1 ed.). New York: Routledge. ISBN 0-415-97228-0.
- Hawthorn, Jeremy (1987). Propaganda, Persuasion and Polemic. Hodder Arnold. ISBN 0-7131-6497-2.
- Lander, Jesse M. (2006). Inventing Polemic: Religion, Print, and Literary Culture in Early Modern England. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-83854-1.
External links
Quotations related to Polemic at Wikiquote
