Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Mach (2nd nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Creating deletion discussion for Jeff Mach |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Jeff Mach}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Jeff Mach}}) |
||
Not [[WP:N|notable]]. There is a lack of coverage about Mach in independent reliable sources. Whilst this article does have [[WP:BOMBARD|many]] sources there is not enough about him as opposed to coverage of events he had involvment in. [[User:Duffbeerforme|duffbeerforme]] ([[User talk:Duffbeerforme|talk]]) 10:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
Not [[WP:N|notable]]. There is a lack of coverage about Mach in independent reliable sources. Whilst this article does have [[WP:BOMBARD|many]] sources there is not enough about him as opposed to coverage of events he had involvment in. [[User:Duffbeerforme|duffbeerforme]] ([[User talk:Duffbeerforme|talk]]) 10:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
||
::'''Oppose''' - This concern was raised and addressed in the last deletion suggestion. The subject is notable, the events are a primary reason for the notability.[[User:Holzman-tweed|Holzman-Tweed]] ([[User talk:Holzman-tweed|talk]]) 13:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 13:50, 25 February 2016
AfDs for this article:
- Jeff Mach (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not notable. There is a lack of coverage about Mach in independent reliable sources. Whilst this article does have many sources there is not enough about him as opposed to coverage of events he had involvment in. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - This concern was raised and addressed in the last deletion suggestion. The subject is notable, the events are a primary reason for the notability.Holzman-Tweed (talk) 13:50, 25 February 2016 (UTC)