Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JellyfishFilms: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
WikiTorch2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiTorch2 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
====<big>Comments by other users</big>==== |
||
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
<small>''Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Guidance#Defending yourself against claims|Defending yourself against claims]].''</small> |
||
*IagoQnsi and IagoQnsi2 have been a nuisance on several pages. I cannot understand the correlation between the two accounts and the conflicting viewpoints are an unessessary. I have no affiliation with [[JellyFishFilms]] |
*IagoQnsi and IagoQnsi2 have been a nuisance on several pages. I cannot understand the correlation between the two accounts and the conflicting viewpoints are an unessessary. I have no affiliation with [[JellyFishFilms]] [[Special:Contributions/WikiTorch2|contribs]]) 15:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC) |
||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
Revision as of 15:37, 17 March 2016
JellyfishFilms
- JellyfishFilms (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JellyfishFilms/Archive.
17 March 2016
– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- IagoQnsi2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- PatRoller2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- JoeMahms (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- WikiTorch2 (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
Accounts seem to have been created for the sole purpose of voting "Keep" on AfDs I started on articles created by JellyfishFilms. (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bobo Norco initially, then Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Domenick Nati and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ryan Totka). Also worth noting: all of these suspected sockpuppets except PatRoller2 are using the exact same custom signature, with the talk page link in a very specific shade of green. -IagoQnsi (talk) 14:47, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- WikiTorch2 is now duplicating my signature instead of the previous one he'd been using (which I've just realized was copied from User:SwisterTwister's signature) and claiming this sockpuppet accusation is false. Perhaps checkuser would be in order here? -IagoQnsi (talk) 15:19, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
- IagoQnsi and IagoQnsi2 have been a nuisance on several pages. I cannot understand the correlation between the two accounts and the conflicting viewpoints are an unessessary. I have no affiliation with JellyFishFilms contribs) 15:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- I already blocked IagoQnsi2 for username impersonation. BethNaught (talk) 15:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
- It looks like a duck to me, but since IagoQnsi2 was created on the 15th and the rest were created today, it's possible there are some unused socks we haven't detected. I'm requesting CheckUser to check for sleepers and to provide technical evidence to verify the (not credibly, but nevertheless) disputed behavioural evidence. BethNaught (talk) 15:24, 17 March 2016 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
- IagoQnsi and IagoQnsi2 have been a nuisance on several pages. I cannot understand the correlation between the two accounts and the conflicting viewpoints are an unessessary. I have no affiliation with JellyFishFilms (talk) 15:32, 17 March 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiTorch2 (talk • contribs)