User talk:Wjs of edmonton: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:26, 26 March 2016

March 2016

Hello, I'm Chrisw80. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Nik Richie seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Chrisw80 (talk) 01:30, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Nik Richie. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Chrisw80 (talk) 02:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Nik Richie, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Nik Richie was changed by Wjs of edmonton (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85367 on 2016-03-26T02:12:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chris. With all the legal on his description, I would hardly have to quote why I corrected it as a defamatory site. We want the truth posted, right? I understand your previous concerns. All his quotes a defamatory in nature. I could put a link to his website? Can you please insert my new edits? Unless you beleive his site is not defamatory in nature and he is constantly getting sued because of it.

Revision as of 02:12, 26 March 2016 edit ClueBot NG (talk \| contribs) Bots, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 6,401,226 edits Warning Wjs of edmonton - #3 ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:26, 26 March 2016 edit undo Wjs of edmonton (talk \| contribs) 23 edits →‎March 2016 Next edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg\|left\|25px\|alt=\|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Nik Richie]], you may be [[WP:BLOCK\|blocked from editing]].<br>Your edits have been '''automatically''' marked as [[WP:Vandalism\|vandalism]] and have been '''automatically''' [[Help:Reverting\|reverted]]. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: [[Nik Richie]] was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nik+Richie&diff=711972220&oldid=711971824 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/Wjs of edmonton\|Wjs of edmonton]] [[User:Wjs of edmonton\|(u)]] [[User talk:Wjs of edmonton\|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.85367 on 2016-03-26T02:12:39+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 2599948 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning3 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:ClueBot NG\|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG\|talk]]) 02:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)		[[File:Nuvola apps important.svg\|left\|25px\|alt=\|link=]] Please stop your [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing\|disruptive editing]]. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism\|vandalize]] Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Nik Richie]], you may be [[WP:BLOCK\|blocked from editing]].<br>Your edits have been '''automatically''' marked as [[WP:Vandalism\|vandalism]] and have been '''automatically''' [[Help:Reverting\|reverted]]. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: [[Nik Richie]] was [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nik+Richie&diff=711972220&oldid=711971824 changed] by [[Special:Contributions/Wjs of edmonton\|Wjs of edmonton]] [[User:Wjs of edmonton\|(u)]] [[User talk:Wjs of edmonton\|(t)]] ANN scored at 0.85367 on 2016-03-26T02:12:39+00:00 <!-- MySQL ID: 2599948 -->. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-cluebotwarning3 --><!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:ClueBot NG\|ClueBot NG]] ([[User talk:ClueBot NG\|talk]]) 02:12, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

			Thank you Chris. With all the legal on his description, I would hardly have to quote why I corrected it as a defamatory site. We want the truth posted, right? I understand your previous concerns. All his quotes a defamatory in nature. I could put a link to his website? Can you please insert my new edits? Unless you beleive his site is not defamatory in nature and he is constantly getting sued because of it.