Talk:Strata SE1: Difference between revisions
Secretlondon (talk | contribs) →NPOV dispute Sustainability: the turbines are cosmetic, but we need sources |
|||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
According to local news reports the turbines are hardly ever turning, and when they are they cause excessive noise and vibration in the upper apartments. For this reason they are not allowed to turn at night. Residents also complain about the heat and water supply. Seems to be a costly folly. Who would have thought it?[[Special:Contributions/86.183.202.156|86.183.202.156]] ([[User talk:86.183.202.156|talk]]) 17:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC) |
According to local news reports the turbines are hardly ever turning, and when they are they cause excessive noise and vibration in the upper apartments. For this reason they are not allowed to turn at night. Residents also complain about the heat and water supply. Seems to be a costly folly. Who would have thought it?[[Special:Contributions/86.183.202.156|86.183.202.156]] ([[User talk:86.183.202.156|talk]]) 17:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Anyone with a brain |
|||
Re who would have thought? |
|||
A represtative of the Wikipedia/London branch has been instructed to get the input required visa vis wikipedia guidelines, of thetenants of the builing in th e aticle. I hav e just come back from the pub so I hope that you can please forgive the spelling. It is at least. Unamerican! |
|||
[[User:Weatherlawyer|Weatherlawyer]] ([[User talk:Weatherlawyer|talk]]) 16:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC) |
|||
== NPOV dispute Sustainability == |
== NPOV dispute Sustainability == |
Revision as of 16:27, 28 March 2016
![]() | London Start‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
|
Renaming the article
It seems that the building is now being called "Strata SE1" (SE1 being the first part of its postcode). It may be worth renaming the article to reflect this? --Zefrog (talk) 16:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Wind turbines incorporated
I'm rather confused by the sources that state this is the first building to have wind turbines incorporated into its design. I was in Bahrain two years ago and the Bahrain World Trade Center also includes wind turbines - and that predates Strata considerably. How do we deal with this? Tim (Xevious) (talk) 18:07, 14 December 2010 (UTC)
The idea (I think) is that the turbines in the Bahrain building are not part of the structure of the building itself but are effectively attached between two buildings. --79.173.160.170 (talk) 11:01, 23 January 2012 (UTC)
According to local news reports the turbines are hardly ever turning, and when they are they cause excessive noise and vibration in the upper apartments. For this reason they are not allowed to turn at night. Residents also complain about the heat and water supply. Seems to be a costly folly. Who would have thought it?86.183.202.156 (talk) 17:08, 2 August 2013 (UTC)
- Anyone with a brain
Re who would have thought? A represtative of the Wikipedia/London branch has been instructed to get the input required visa vis wikipedia guidelines, of thetenants of the builing in th e aticle. I hav e just come back from the pub so I hope that you can please forgive the spelling. It is at least. Unamerican!
Weatherlawyer (talk) 16:27, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
NPOV dispute Sustainability
I have added an NPOV tag to the sustainability section of this article as I thin the claim are spurious. The sources appear just to repeat the developers claims. As a Civil Engineer the claims seem dubious at best, and the incorporated wind turbines are a clear folly as cannot turn into the wind seriously limiting their performance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.169.66.156 (talk) 15:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
- The wind turbines certainly don't operate but we need a source for this. Secretlondon (talk) 14:53, 23 February 2015 (UTC)