Portfolio strategy: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Jordanotto (talk | contribs) ~~~~ |
Jordanotto (talk | contribs) m ~~~ |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{notability|date=March 2016}} |
{{notability|date=March 2016}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
The '''portfolio strategy''' is a method for continuously improving educational opportunities in urban K-12 school systems.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.msdf.org/blog/2012/11/portfolio-schools-a-comprehensive-approach-to-district-improvement/|title=Portfolio Schools: A Comprehensive Approach to District Improvement|website=Michael & Susan Dell Foundation|language=en-US|access-date=2016-03-18}}</ref>The strategy entails managing a portfolio of schools by separating school oversight from school operations and by holding a school's status as contingent, rather than permanent, based on the |
The '''portfolio strategy''' is a method for continuously improving educational opportunities in urban K-12 school systems.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.msdf.org/blog/2012/11/portfolio-schools-a-comprehensive-approach-to-district-improvement/|title=Portfolio Schools: A Comprehensive Approach to District Improvement|website=Michael & Susan Dell Foundation|language=en-US|access-date=2016-03-18}}</ref> The strategy entails managing a portfolio of schools by separating school oversight from school operations and by holding a school's status as contingent, rather than permanent, based on the school's performance.<ref>[http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED532895.pdf Lake, Robin (2009), Performance Management in Portfolio Districts]</ref><ref>{{cite book|last1=Hill|first1=Paul|last2=Campbell|first2=Christine|last3=Guthrie|first3=James|title=Strife and Progress: Portfolio Strategies for Managing Urban Schools|date=2013|publisher=Brookings Institution Press|location=Washington, D.C.|isbn=978-0-8157-2427-8}}</ref> |
||
The portfolio strategy in practice can be reduced to seven interrelated components: choice, autonomy, talent, varied supports, accountability, funding, and public engagement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.crpe.org/research/portfolio-strategy/seven-components|website=Center on Reinventing Public Education|accessdate=11 April 2016}}</ref> |
The portfolio strategy in practice can be reduced to seven interrelated components: choice, autonomy, talent, varied supports, accountability, funding, and public engagement.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.crpe.org/research/portfolio-strategy/seven-components|website=Center on Reinventing Public Education|accessdate=11 April 2016}}</ref> |
||
Revision as of 20:57, 28 April 2016
 | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these template messages)
|
The portfolio strategy is a method for continuously improving educational opportunities in urban K-12 school systems.[1] The strategy entails managing a portfolio of schools by separating school oversight from school operations and by holding a school's status as contingent, rather than permanent, based on the school's performance.[2][3]
The portfolio strategy in practice can be reduced to seven interrelated components: choice, autonomy, talent, varied supports, accountability, funding, and public engagement.[4]
References
- ^ "Portfolio Schools: A Comprehensive Approach to District Improvement". Michael & Susan Dell Foundation. Retrieved 2016-03-18.
- ^ Lake, Robin (2009), Performance Management in Portfolio Districts
- ^ Hill, Paul; Campbell, Christine; Guthrie, James (2013). Strife and Progress: Portfolio Strategies for Managing Urban Schools. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 978-0-8157-2427-8.
- ^ Center on Reinventing Public Education http://www.crpe.org/research/portfolio-strategy/seven-components. Retrieved 11 April 2016.
{{cite web}}: Missing or empty|title=(help)
 | This article has not been added to any content categories. Please help out by adding categories to it so that it can be listed with similar articles. (March 2016) |