Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hypocaustic: Difference between revisions
Lwarrenwiki (talk | contribs) |
NRC SDK log (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
====<big>Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</big>==== |
||
{{Confirmed}}, although the behavioral evidence would probably have been enough by itself to justify blocking here. [[User:NRC SDK log|DoRD]] ([[User talk:NRC SDK log|talk]]) 13:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC) |
|||
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
----<!--- All comments go ABOVE this line, please. --> |
||
Revision as of 13:42, 20 May 2016
Hypocaustic
- Hypocaustic (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- Populated account categories: confirmed
18 May 2016
– This SPI case is open.
- Suspected sockpuppets
- Little Fluffy Clod (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
- User compare report Auto-generated every hour.
- Editor interaction utility
[1]. Again falsely claiming the "train station" is wrong, an incorrect assertion that was the perenial claim of Hypocaustic, and his subsequent socks, complete with the edit warring afterwards. Also, pointless changes in ENGVAR when there's no WP:TIES, as seen here, much as the prior accounts did. In other words, WP:DUCK. oknazevad (talk) 03:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Addendum. The latest account dates to shortly after the prior ones were blocked, as was the case before. oknazevad (talk) 03:35, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Probably should also mention the hack job on the lead at train station he did here, claiming "neutrality", despite the well established consensus about the title of the article. oknazevad (talk) 03:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Comments by other users
Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.
In the dab page Station, the accused's recent edits concerning "train station" were persistently repeated after being reverted. I sought help at Talk:Train station, where the behavioral pattern was quickly recognized. After reviewing the archived SPI investigations, based on comparing previous behavior with edit history at Station, I support this request by oknazevad. Lwarrenwiki (talk) 04:08, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Confirmed, although the behavioral evidence would probably have been enough by itself to justify blocking here. DoRD (talk) 13:42, 20 May 2016 (UTC)