Talk:Ancient Egyptian philosophy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=mid|class=stub|ancient=yes}} |
{{WikiProject Philosophy|importance=mid|class=stub|ancient=yes}} |
||
{{WikiProject Ancient Egypt|class=stub|importance=mid}} |
{{WikiProject Ancient Egypt|class=stub|importance=mid}} |
||
This page ought to be subject to serious review, since I had to remove a number of Afrocentrist sources that provide historically dubious claims that rely on spurious historiography, as well as a number of unsourced claims that were either demonstrably false or added nothing of substance to the article. |
|||
Furthermore, if any reputable work were to be added, it would amount to an explanation that 'Ancient Egyptian philosophy' bore little relation to Ancient Greek philosophy, there is no evidence that Ancient Greek philosophy was indebted to Ancient Egyptian philosophy, beliefs to the contrary are due to reliance on the work of historical revisionists that engage in wild conjecture without historical basis or on disreputable Ancient Greek sources like Diogenes Laertius. |
|||
Lastly, the very understanding of extant 'Ancient Egyptian philosophy' would better be understood as guides to social mores (the didactic texts known as 'instructions'), state ideology ('Maat'), theology, and early cosmology and cosmogony. In the surviving texts there is no critical discussion between differing schools, no exegesis, or argumentation. Theology and etiquette does not conform to what either the Western or Eastern traditions consider philosophy. |
Revision as of 14:42, 29 May 2016
![]() | Philosophy: Ancient Stub‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ancient Egypt Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||||
|
This page ought to be subject to serious review, since I had to remove a number of Afrocentrist sources that provide historically dubious claims that rely on spurious historiography, as well as a number of unsourced claims that were either demonstrably false or added nothing of substance to the article.
Furthermore, if any reputable work were to be added, it would amount to an explanation that 'Ancient Egyptian philosophy' bore little relation to Ancient Greek philosophy, there is no evidence that Ancient Greek philosophy was indebted to Ancient Egyptian philosophy, beliefs to the contrary are due to reliance on the work of historical revisionists that engage in wild conjecture without historical basis or on disreputable Ancient Greek sources like Diogenes Laertius.
Lastly, the very understanding of extant 'Ancient Egyptian philosophy' would better be understood as guides to social mores (the didactic texts known as 'instructions'), state ideology ('Maat'), theology, and early cosmology and cosmogony. In the surviving texts there is no critical discussion between differing schools, no exegesis, or argumentation. Theology and etiquette does not conform to what either the Western or Eastern traditions consider philosophy.