Jump to content

User talk:Onel5969: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user is a WikiGnome.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Scythe33 (talk | contribs)
461 edits
No edit summary
Scythe33 (talk | contribs)
461 edits
No edit summary
Line 137: Line 137:
Hi, could you please inform us, how is the references that we use are not notable or verifiable? those are all the information that we have about page365. This Page365 is very similar with [[soldsie]], thus we would like to make similar article about the sample of social commerce.
Hi, could you please inform us, how is the references that we use are not notable or verifiable? those are all the information that we have about page365. This Page365 is very similar with [[soldsie]], thus we would like to make similar article about the sample of social commerce.


>Revert of [[Miami]]
== Revert of [[Miami]] ==


You can't link directly to census data. The previous link was not the actual citation either. There's no point in reverting. [[User:Scythe33|Scythe33]] ([[User talk:Scythe33|talk]]) 20:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)
You can't link directly to census data. The previous link was not the actual citation either. There's no point in reverting. And way to make it harder for me instead of simply asking. [[User:Scythe33|Scythe33]] ([[User talk:Scythe33|talk]]) 20:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:27, 31 May 2016

Onel5969's Talk
Phoenix ... It's a dry heat ...
Born
New York city
NationalityAmerican
SEMI-RETIRED
Am waffling between this and full retirement. I may or may not respond to any messages left here. If you have a query regarding an AfC issue, please leave your question at that site, or at the Teahouse. Best of luck to you all.

08:50:09, 24 May 2016 review of submission by Janani.Jayabal


01:56:00, 25 May 2016 review of submission by Flashpepi



I have added citations, deleted citations and tidied up the format of my article Marc Clark (sculptor). Could you please review and suggest any further changes, as neccessary, before I re-submit the article,

Thanks,

John Flashpepi (talk) 01:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)Flashpepi (talk) 08:25, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I have been advised to make further changes which I have done,

cheers,

JohnFlashpepi (talk) 09:05, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Centaur_Asset_Management

Can you please assist now. I've made the requested changes wrote it in Prose format. Removed services and all keeping it precise to the briefest information on company. Cited very credible independent source referring back to the company. What else can would you suggest. Thanks for your assistance so far. --Mahmoodyaqub (talk) 11:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

21:54:06, 25 May 2016 review of submission by Etaft


Hi, thanks for your feedback -- I'm new to wikipedia writing. I think I fixed the issues with reliable sourcing. Added several links, replaced one or two others. Is this sufficient, or do more lines need sources?

03:39:29, 26 May 2016 review of submission by Tdeblase94


I do not understand why Margherita Datini is for some reason not considered "notable" enough, so I would certainly appreciate a re-review. I used nearly all the references available for her, including the excellent work done by historian Ann Crabb; Datini is fully deserving of a Wikipedia page as the writing she did was important to Prato's merchant politics and the role of women during the time. I worked very hard on this research and I'm extremely disappointed that the entry did not go through. I think a great amount of people could benefit from learning about her life.

05:36:29, 26 May 2016 review of submission by 121.128.1.17


Thank you so much for the review and feedback. I checked the references you recommended for more information and am wondering if you had any more specific requests about how to improve the page with regards to citations specifically. There are many other beauty pageant titleholders who are included in Wikipedia who have much fewer citations concerning coverage or interviews on newspapers and international media. Should I remove some information to simply make it more basic and only have information on the page that was covered by newspapers and television?

Thank you very much for your time and help.

11:29:22, 26 May 2016 review of submission by IZSoperations



Would it be possible to help me understand exactly what I need to do in order that my submission might be accepted;I understand that rejections are most common because of lack of references, a lack of notability, and too much bias in the writing style. Regarding the first two, could you let me know if the following would be a good start and I am on the right track:

Notability: attaching links to Biographies etc, of the founder members, together with the council members, Also, I would put the Professional Standards ie EQA etc, in long hand afterwards. Validation: In the Professional Standards paragraph, if I write the acronyms out in full ; Credibility: if I can provide examples of where the professional Standards have been used maybe

Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Regards

14:21:51, 26 May 2016 review of submission by Hannah Quarantine


Hello, I'm new to Wikipedia and I'm trying to set up a page for theatre company, Quarantine. My draft has been rejected because it reads 'more like an advert than an encyclopaedia entry'. It was rejected previously on the 12 May for the same reason, with the comment that it contained 'peacock language.' I tried to amend it by taking out what might be read as 'peacock language' but clearly there is still a problem - is there anything else I can do to make the draft more acceptable? Would I be right in guessing that this is no longer an issue of language, but of the fact that many of the references link the Quarantine's website? Advice/guidance would be very much appreciated. Thank you, Hannah.

Thanks for all your hard work over the years

I just happened to click a link to your user page today and noticed the semi-retirement message. Thank you for your work, especially at AfC. Best, /wiae /tlk 15:24, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Jay Solomon Source

Hello. I am sorry to start a new section, but I cannot find my original note. The mention of Solomon's role with VidaPrimo is at the bottom of the Video Age article I used as a source. The first source I used was a press release. The second one from Video Age was not. Please adviseLG Brichetto (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13:42:48, 28 May 2016 review of submission by Gsv gravitas zero


I'm not sure I'm doing this right. Can you let me know if there's anything more needed on the Robert Valley submission? If not, is there anything else I need to to as the queue position seems to be rising rather than going down. Thank you for your time and patience.

08:55:34, 30 May 2016 review of submission by TJ847


Hi Onel5969,

Would it possible to point out the unsatisfactory parts of my article, ie. the sources, or the written copy in certain sections? I have made a couple of edits over the past month but they might have been in the wrong direction.

Thanks for everything thus far!

Review of submission by DrArminius re Draft:Allan_Anderson_(theologian)

Dear Onel5969,

Thank you for flagging up your concerns re: notability. I am collecting evidence to rectify this and hope to demonstrate Professor Anderson's notability to your satisfaction very soon.

Kind regards. DrArminius (talk) 20:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sharvesb (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)== Request on 03:39:13, 31 May 2016 for assistance on AfC submission by Sharvesb == [reply]


Hi,

I would like to check why the edited submission for my draft is still under review. It stated as 7 days but it has been close to 11 days since submission but there has been no feedback. Do let me know. Thanks.

Do take note that formatting and reference to the company's websites and sources have been edited to suit your editors comments. Do let me know if there's anything further.

Sharvesb (talk) 03:39, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

05:46:39, 31 May 2016 review of submission by Scomma



Hi, could you please inform us, how is the references that we use are not notable or verifiable? those are all the information that we have about page365. This Page365 is very similar with soldsie, thus we would like to make similar article about the sample of social commerce.

Revert of Miami

You can't link directly to census data. The previous link was not the actual citation either. There's no point in reverting. And way to make it harder for me instead of simply asking. Scythe33 (talk) 20:22, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Onel5969&oldid=723070345"