Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Muilenburg: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
expanded nom
Muilenta (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:
:({{Find sources AFD|Tony Muilenburg}})
:({{Find sources AFD|Tony Muilenburg}})
Does not pass [[WP:PROF]] or [[WP:N]] guidelines. The subject is an adjunct professor with no notable achievements inside or outside of academics. The assertion of significance through the video tutorials appears moot as the tutorials are self published. [[User:ERK|<font color="">'''ERK'''</font>]]<small><sup>[[User_talk:ERK|<font color=""> talk</font>]]</sup></small> 21:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Does not pass [[WP:PROF]] or [[WP:N]] guidelines. The subject is an adjunct professor with no notable achievements inside or outside of academics. The assertion of significance through the video tutorials appears moot as the tutorials are self published. [[User:ERK|<font color="">'''ERK'''</font>]]<small><sup>[[User_talk:ERK|<font color=""> talk</font>]]</sup></small> 21:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Hey, I think WP:Prof should be okay. The education hardware he developed is being used at both OSU and PSU, and the material he teaches at PSU is unique and highly valued. Also, he has tens of thousands of hits on youtube for the video tutorials. I added a few more references that were not self published. [[User:Muilenta|Muilenta]] ([[User talk:Muilenta|talk]]) 23:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:13, 16 June 2016

Tony Muilenburg (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:PROF or WP:N guidelines. The subject is an adjunct professor with no notable achievements inside or outside of academics. The assertion of significance through the video tutorials appears moot as the tutorials are self published. ERK talk 21:31, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I think WP:Prof should be okay. The education hardware he developed is being used at both OSU and PSU, and the material he teaches at PSU is unique and highly valued. Also, he has tens of thousands of hits on youtube for the video tutorials. I added a few more references that were not self published. Muilenta (talk) 23:12, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]