User talk:Mann Mann: Difference between revisions
→Tirgil34: Reply |
|||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:{{Reply|YoCuzwaasup}} Hi. Please read [[WP:RELIABLE]]. Discuss your edits on [[Talk:Medes]]. --[[User:Wario-Man|Wario-Man]] ([[User talk:Wario-Man#top|talk]]) 05:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC) |
:{{Reply|YoCuzwaasup}} Hi. Please read [[WP:RELIABLE]]. Discuss your edits on [[Talk:Medes]]. --[[User:Wario-Man|Wario-Man]] ([[User talk:Wario-Man#top|talk]]) 05:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
== Tirgil34 |
== Tirgil34= |
||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
:::It's not helpful to find all possible and suspected accounts by yourself and then try to report all of them. Because admins usually ignore stale accounts. Plus, admins can find all related accounts by checkuser (stale, active, sleeper and new & untouched ones). You should report recent activities and current active accounts in my opinion. --[[User:Wario-Man|Wario-Man]] ([[User talk:Wario-Man#top|talk]]) 04:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC) |
:::It's not helpful to find all possible and suspected accounts by yourself and then try to report all of them. Because admins usually ignore stale accounts. Plus, admins can find all related accounts by checkuser (stale, active, sleeper and new & untouched ones). You should report recent activities and current active accounts in my opinion. --[[User:Wario-Man|Wario-Man]] ([[User talk:Wario-Man#top|talk]]) 04:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC) |
||
:: No no, you misunderstood me. I am not going to report stale accounts on SPI, of course. I mean, have noticed an another suspicious account that is currently active-That's what I was talking about it. By the way, it is also important to detect stale socks and proxies, thereby can report them when they become active again. Remember Egapleicesp case. Cheers, [[Special:Contributions/46.221.215.221|46.221.215.221]] ([[User talk:46.221.215.221|talk]]) 06:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:54, 22 June 2016
![]() |
|
A section of the Bactria article needs to be addressed.
Recently I was on the talk page on the Bactria article starting a new discussion about the section known as Tokharistan:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bactria
Reason being is because although it says in the last sentence "Later, in the 5th century, it was controlled by the Xionites and the Hephthalites but was reconquered by the Sassanids" There are unfortunately no citations or sources anywhere to support this claim.
See here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bactria#Tokharistan
This is why I believe this must be discussed by the editors of the article. I'm not sure how much have knowledge you have on this, but hopefully you can put your input on this. I linked the discussion for you as I did with Rcsprinter123 Kirby (talk) 05:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Medes
Hi You wrote me on Wikipedia:) My reliable source was Daniel 6 from the Hebrew Scriptures YoCuzwaasup (talk) 22:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
- @YoCuzwaasup: Hi. Please read WP:RELIABLE. Discuss your edits on Talk:Medes. --Wario-Man (talk) 05:46, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
= Tirgil34
Hi Wario-Man,
Take a look at contributions of banned sock Intelinside13core (talk · contribs). It seems that the long-term abuser has obsessed with you since 2012. 46.221.221.7 (talk) 11:04, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
- See this. --Wario-Man (talk) 03:59, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- See 1, 2, 3. Also, I have noticed more socks while I was checking his targeted articles. Thus, the SPI might be a bit late. See this user who restored socks' edits here. The sock account was created in 2012 and re-activated in 2016! I have also noticed plenty of proxies edited the article. 46.221.219.221 (talk) 10:59, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- It's not helpful to find all possible and suspected accounts by yourself and then try to report all of them. Because admins usually ignore stale accounts. Plus, admins can find all related accounts by checkuser (stale, active, sleeper and new & untouched ones). You should report recent activities and current active accounts in my opinion. --Wario-Man (talk) 04:55, 22 June 2016 (UTC)
- No no, you misunderstood me. I am not going to report stale accounts on SPI, of course. I mean, have noticed an another suspicious account that is currently active-That's what I was talking about it. By the way, it is also important to detect stale socks and proxies, thereby can report them when they become active again. Remember Egapleicesp case. Cheers, 46.221.215.221 (talk) 06:54, 22 June 2016 (UTC)