Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FineReport: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Updating nomination page with notices (delsort.js)
Line 6: Line 6:
External sources all simply point to download links, no coverage from [[WP:RS|Reliable Sources]] that I can find on this software. [[User:PGWG|PGWG]] ([[User talk:PGWG|talk]]) 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
External sources all simply point to download links, no coverage from [[WP:RS|Reliable Sources]] that I can find on this software. [[User:PGWG|PGWG]] ([[User talk:PGWG|talk]]) 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:NewYorkActuary|NewYorkActuary]] ([[User talk:NewYorkActuary|talk]]) 05:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Software|list of Software-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:NewYorkActuary|NewYorkActuary]] ([[User talk:NewYorkActuary|talk]]) 05:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete'''. Article fails our notability guideline and has no valid sources at all. [[User:DeVerm|DeVerm]] ([[User talk:DeVerm|talk]]) 05:06, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:06, 29 June 2016

FineReport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

External sources all simply point to download links, no coverage from Reliable Sources that I can find on this software. PGWG (talk) 17:21, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. NewYorkActuary (talk) 05:03, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]