User talk:Dave8899

Please don't upload any more copyright images that you find online

Hello. I am Diannaa and I am an administrator on this wiki. I noticed you are uploading images, almost all of which have been tagged for deletion or are already deleted. Please don't upload any more photos that you find on the Internet or elsewhere. Photos that you find online are copyright, and we are not allowed to display them on this wiki. There's more information about copyrights and how it applies to Wikipedia at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Copyright law and its application are complex matters, and you should not upload any further images until you have taken the time to read and understand our policies. Continuing on your present course will likely lead to a block. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:03, 19 July 2016 (UTC)

1. i asked you about copyright issue on this page before and you couldnt be bothered to respond 2. i already read the copyright guidance closely and thought id done it correctly 3. since you are a moron who cant be bothered to help new users and just threatens them with blocks, ill just forget about uploading any images anymore, you got your wish PS: randomly slamming in templates is useless, if you want to actually help you have to explain the specific problem with each image in your own words

Sorry for not noticing your previous inquiry. The main issues with your photo uploads are: (1) You need to provide a source for each image you upload. (2) We only accept non-free images of people who are dead. Non-free images of living people do not meet our non-free content requirements because (at least in theory) a free image could still be obtained. I see that your question of July 10 was more about prose, and the answer again has to do with our non-free content policy. Excessive quotations from non-free sources are not permitted, because they are easily replaced by freely available prose that we write ourselves. Wikipedia articles need to be for the most part purpose-written prose that we write ourselves, not a collection of quotations. — Diannaa (talk) 21:33, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Omar Hussain for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Omar Hussain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Omar Hussain until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ethanlu121 (talk) 00:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

July 2016

Your addition to Yarmouk Martyrs Brigade has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Material copied from http://www.joshualandis.com/blog/liwa-shuhada-al-yarmouk-history-and-analysis/ S Philbrick(Talk) 12:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

This is your final warning. Further copyright violations will result in you being blocked from editing. — Diannaa (talk) 12:57, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

1. asshole, your automated 'copyright' bot has come up wrong, that joshua landis website is not the source. that website itself took the information from the following 2. the source washttp://www.aymennjawad.org/17860/liwa-shuhada-al-yarmouk-history-and-analysis 3. which displays no copyright on its page and is a free blog 4. all the information was rewritten in my own words

so fucking apologise you fucking administrators are morons and tyrants who hate wikipedia, clearly

+dianna you are literally the worst wikipedian i have ever seen, all you do is threaten to block users even when you are totally in the wrong. i have added well over 20 totally new pages full of great content and this is the welcome i get to wikipedia!!? HA