Jump to content

User talk:Maile66: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Weibinzha (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Weibinzha (talk | contribs)
Line 189: Line 189:
:I see {{u|Redrose64}} has already responded to this on your talk page. It was proposed for speedy deletion as [[WP:NOTADVERTISING|advertising]]. I'm the admin who deleted it. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66#top|talk]]) 12:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
:I see {{u|Redrose64}} has already responded to this on your talk page. It was proposed for speedy deletion as [[WP:NOTADVERTISING|advertising]]. I'm the admin who deleted it. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66#top|talk]]) 12:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
::Not exactly, I responded at [[User talk:Velella#Deletion Inquiry]] - {{u|Velella}} is the user who marked it {{tlx|db-spam}}. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 15:42, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
::Not exactly, I responded at [[User talk:Velella#Deletion Inquiry]] - {{u|Velella}} is the user who marked it {{tlx|db-spam}}. --[[User:Redrose64|<span style="color:#a80000; background:#ffeeee; text-decoration:inherit">Red</span>rose64]] ([[User talk:Redrose64|talk]]) 15:42, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
:::Could you please let me know how can I retrieve the deleted material for future reference and improvement?
:::Could you please let me know how can I retrieve the deleted material for future reference and improvement?[[User:Weibinzha|Weibinzha]] ([[User talk:Weibinzha|talk]]) 18:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)
[[User:Weibinzha|Weibinzha]] ([[User talk:Weibinzha|talk]]) 18:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:40, 31 July 2016

Please post new message Subject in this box, and click New Section button

Editor of the Week : nominations needed!

The Editor of the Week initiative has been recognizing editors since 2013 for their hard work and dedication. Editing Wikipedia can be disheartening and tedious at times; the weekly Editor of the Week award lets its recipients know that their positive behaviour and collaborative spirit is appreciated. The response from the honorees has been enthusiastic and thankful.

The list of nominees is running short, and so new nominations are needed for consideration. Have you come across someone in your editing circle who deserves a pat on the back for improving article prose regularly, making it easier to understand? Or perhaps someone has stepped in to mediate a contentious dispute, and did an excellent job. Do you know someone who hasn't received many accolades and is deserving of greater renown? Is there an editor who does lots of little tasks well, such as cleaning up citations?

Please help us thank editors who display sustained patterns of excellence, working tirelessly in the background out of the spotlight, by submitting your nomination for Editor of the Week today!

Sent on behalf of Buster Seven Talk for the Editor of the Week initiative by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I messed up you sig. I'm rushed to get to work. But I inadvertently left a message on your Nom's page. Hpoe the surprise isn't ruined~ Sorry. Buster Seven Talk 13:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, well...all things will work out. — Maile (talk) 13:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The 50,000 edits barnstar
Congratulations on receiving this! Also, congrats on your success rate on your RFA! Hope you win. Peter Sam Fan 15:07, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this, and thank you for both your support and your questsion over there. — Maile (talk) 15:51, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Admin's Barnstar
Hi Maile, this is to thank you for becoming an administrator so you could work on the DYK queues! I saw how you adroitly promoted the sets around the P6 set that you had filled, in the absence of another admin. Your efforts to keep the DYK wheels moving are very appreciated! Best, Yoninah (talk) 23:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Maile,

You earned your cookie with this catch. All the refs were in French so I just AGF'd. Yoninah (talk) 23:15, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reviews

In case you have any interest in chipping in, I'm always scrounging for editors to review draft re-writes of low-quality articles where I have a COI.[1][2] CorporateM (Talk) 14:42, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

CorporateM I haven't been ignoring you, but I've had other priorities the last couple of weeks, and continue to have my attention mostly directed off-wiki. I glanced at these and see no problems except they are just two of many waiting in line to be reviewed. As difficult as the wait is, such is the case with every review process on Wikipedia. I don't have time to devote to doing the reviews for you, but you are welcome to ask anyone else for assistance. — Maile (talk) 11:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Bugle: Issue CXXIII, July 2016

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 12:44, 7 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the promotion

I glanced at and meant to review your article, but the coordinators were too fast for me. Please let me know of your next FAC nomination.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:26, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 21 July 2016

Wikipedia email re NewspaperArchive signup

Hello, Maile66. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 18:16, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@HazelAB: I received the above mentioned email from you almost instantaneously. I filled out the Google online form that day. However, a week later, I've never received anything at all from the NewspaperArchive people. Please advise. — Maile (talk) 21:26, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I will follow up with our NewspaperArchive contact person. HazelAB (talk) 22:08, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia email re Newspapers.com signup

Hello, Maile66. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 18:19, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quarterly Milhist Reviewing Award

Military history reviewers' award
On behalf of the Milhist coordinators, you are hereby awarded the Milhist reviewing award (1 stripe) for reviewing a total of 1 Milhist article during the period April to June 2016. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 02:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep track of upcoming reviews. Just copy and paste {{WPMILHIST Review alerts}} to your user space

19:54, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

Newspapers.com access

You should have full access to Newspapers.com now. All the best, HazelAB (talk) 12:49, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Inquiry

Hi,

I just noticed my page Buygoodeals was deleted by you. I made it just because I want to share information about one new thing. Could you please let me know why you think my page buygoodeals is advertising or promotion? I am new to WIKI, please help me to improve. Thanks!

Best regards, WeibinWeibinzha (talk) 08:38, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see Redrose64 has already responded to this on your talk page. It was proposed for speedy deletion as advertising. I'm the admin who deleted it. — Maile (talk) 12:14, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not exactly, I responded at User talk:Velella#Deletion Inquiry - Velella is the user who marked it {{db-spam}}. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:42, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please let me know how can I retrieve the deleted material for future reference and improvement?Weibinzha (talk) 18:40, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]