Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Codeproof: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Added a few more delsort tags
Shilpacs (talk | contribs)
proposed revision
Line 10: Line 10:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 01:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Companies|list of Companies-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 01:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Washington|list of Washington-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 01:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Washington|list of Washington-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Marchjuly|Marchjuly]] ([[User talk:Marchjuly|talk]]) 01:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)</small>

*I am working on a improved article here in my [[User:Shilpacs/sandbox|sandbox]]. I have added genuine third-party references and more. Please provide me feedback. i look forward to working with community. [[User:Shilpacs|Shilpacs]] ([[User talk:Shilpacs|talk]]) 03:06, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Revision as of 03:06, 15 November 2016

Codeproof (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article about a non-notable company (almost no 3rd party coverage) written mainly by a COI editor. It's struggled with promotional content since its inception and is currently effectively a promotion. Cleanup tags unresolved since Jan. 2016. Nominated here because my WP:PROD was contested by the COI editor. FalconK (talk) 02:05, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I couldn't find sources to meet WP:CORPDEPTH. The Redmond Reporter interview is the longest source out there, but it's free a weekly community newsletter with a circ of about 25,000, which gives it little weight, per WP:AUD. Interviews are also poor for notability in general. This GeekWire puff is slightly broader, but it's super softball: less an interview and more a platform for the founder's musings on the industry. It's also a column which invites any startup in the region to "Apply for Startup Spotlight" which undermines any claim of neutrality. I looked, but found nothing better. Grayfell (talk) 02:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Dialectric (talk) 20:37, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Marchjuly (talk) 01:36, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]