Carmen Proetta: Difference between revisions
migrating Persondata to Wikidata, please help, see challenges for this article |
Rescuing 1 sources and tagging 0 as dead. #IABot (v1.2.7.1) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
All of these accusations were later shown to be unproven.<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2003/aug/11/mondaymediasection.hutton Speaking ill of the dead | Media | The Guardian<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Proetta launched a libel action case against five of the newspapers and was subsequently awarded an estimated £300,000 damages in an out of court settlement. |
All of these accusations were later shown to be unproven.<ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2003/aug/11/mondaymediasection.hutton Speaking ill of the dead | Media | The Guardian<!-- Bot generated title -->]</ref> Proetta launched a libel action case against five of the newspapers and was subsequently awarded an estimated £300,000 damages in an out of court settlement. |
||
<ref> |
<ref>{{cite web|url=http://multimedia.carlton.com/images/pilger/media/pdf/media.pdf |title=Archived copy |accessdate=2008-06-14 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20060906215927/http://multimedia.carlton.com:80/images/pilger/media/pdf/media.pdf |archivedate=2006-09-06 |df= }}: Half of total of £300,000 in damages to Carmen Proetta paid by the ''Sunday Times''</ref><ref>[http://www.guardian.co.uk/hutton/story/0,,1025985,00.html]: Notes substantial damages in relation to erroneous claims in ''The Sun''</ref> |
||
==See also== |
==See also== |
||
Revision as of 20:56, 15 November 2016
Carmen Proetta is an independent witness to Operation Flavius, a controversial British Army operation in which the Special Air Service shot dead three unarmed Provisional IRA members in Gibraltar on 6 March 1988. She became the subject of a number of articles by several British newspapers who later paid her substantial damages in an out of court settlement.
Proetta had given a statement to the police, saying that she was washing dishes when she looked out her kitchen window and witnessed the killings. According to her account, two of the three West Belfast suspects, Mairead Farrell and Dan McCann had their hands in the air when they were shot without warning.
Her claims were made public a month later in an interview for the award-winning Thames Television documentary Death on the Rock.
In her interview she said "They [security forces] didn't do anything ... they just went and shot these people. That's all. They didn’t say anything, they didn't scream, they didn't shout, they didn't do anything. These people were turning their heads back to see what was happening and when they saw these men had guns in their hands they put their hands up. It looked like the man was protecting the girl because he stood in front of her, but there was no chance. I mean they went to the floor immediately, they dropped."[1]
After the programme was broadcast, several British newspapers, including The Sun and The Sunday Times ran stories about her background. The Sun ran a headline labelling her the 'The tart of Gib'. Its front-page story accused her of being a former prostitute and of running an escort agency. Her husband was described as 'a sleazy drug peddler', and both were accused of being 'anti-British'.
All of these accusations were later shown to be unproven.[2] Proetta launched a libel action case against five of the newspapers and was subsequently awarded an estimated £300,000 damages in an out of court settlement. [3][4]
See also
- Operation Flavius
- Death on the Rock; a controversial documentary about the shootings.
Notes
- ^ State Violence: Northern Ireland 1969-1997, Raymond Murray, Mercier Press, Dublin, 1998, ISBN 1-85635-235-8 , pg. 193
- ^ Speaking ill of the dead | Media | The Guardian
- ^ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-09-06. Retrieved 2008-06-14.
{{cite web}}: Unknown parameter|deadurl=ignored (|url-status=suggested) (help)CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link): Half of total of £300,000 in damages to Carmen Proetta paid by the Sunday Times - ^ [1]: Notes substantial damages in relation to erroneous claims in The Sun