User talk:101.182.161.253

November 2016

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for evading a previous block. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mkdw^talk 04:27, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

101.182.161.253 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have looked at the linked reasoning and it is heavily circumstantial and does not establish me as this Curse of Fenric fellow. I believe this block to be incorrect and an error has been made. Note that in a deletion discussion that I put in a recent discussion, Curse of Fenric wanted Global Warning to be kept 9for the life of me I don't know why). The link off Wikipedia has been misinterpreted in my opinion as there is no indication that he has changed his mind on that. This is at worst co-incidence for which I should not be punished. 101.182.161.253 (talk) 07:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I have looked at the linked reasoning and it is heavily circumstantial and does not establish me as this Curse of Fenric fellow. I believe this block to be incorrect and an error has been made. Note that in a deletion discussion that I put in a recent discussion, Curse of Fenric wanted Global Warning to be kept 9for the life of me I don't know why). The link off Wikipedia has been misinterpreted in my opinion as there is no indication that he has changed his mind on that. This is at worst co-incidence for which I should not be punished. [[Special:Contributions/101.182.161.253|101.182.161.253]] ([[User talk:101.182.161.253#top|talk]]) 07:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have looked at the linked reasoning and it is heavily circumstantial and does not establish me as this Curse of Fenric fellow. I believe this block to be incorrect and an error has been made. Note that in a deletion discussion that I put in a recent discussion, Curse of Fenric wanted Global Warning to be kept 9for the life of me I don't know why). The link off Wikipedia has been misinterpreted in my opinion as there is no indication that he has changed his mind on that. This is at worst co-incidence for which I should not be punished. [[Special:Contributions/101.182.161.253|101.182.161.253]] ([[User talk:101.182.161.253#top|talk]]) 07:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I have looked at the linked reasoning and it is heavily circumstantial and does not establish me as this Curse of Fenric fellow. I believe this block to be incorrect and an error has been made. Note that in a deletion discussion that I put in a recent discussion, Curse of Fenric wanted Global Warning to be kept 9for the life of me I don't know why). The link off Wikipedia has been misinterpreted in my opinion as there is no indication that he has changed his mind on that. This is at worst co-incidence for which I should not be punished. [[Special:Contributions/101.182.161.253|101.182.161.253]] ([[User talk:101.182.161.253#top|talk]]) 07:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}