Talk:Cordelia Stanwood: Difference between revisions
→Looking good!: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
|||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
Hey! Your article is looking good so far! I would like to see some of her photography under the photography section along with some of the background on the photo. I think it would give good perspective on her and her life. Just my opinion. [[User:Harg6896|Harg6896]] ([[User talk:Harg6896|talk]]) 03:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
Hey! Your article is looking good so far! I would like to see some of her photography under the photography section along with some of the background on the photo. I think it would give good perspective on her and her life. Just my opinion. [[User:Harg6896|Harg6896]] ([[User talk:Harg6896|talk]]) 03:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC) |
||
Thank you! I tried to find a picture once and I came up short. There are not many pictures out there when you go to insert a picture from the internet. You can see a picture of her at the Birdsacre website, but I'm not sure how to get that on Wikipedia. Thanks for reviewing! [[User:Hrm0815|Hrm0815]] ([[User talk:Hrm0815|talk]]) 05:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Oklahoma/History_of_Science_Since_the_17th_Century_(Fall_2016) |
Revision as of 05:10, 21 November 2016
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hrm0815 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Pham8713, Harg6896.
I have found these resources to start this article: [1], [2], and [3] Hrm0815 (talk) 18:36, 6 November 2016 (UTC)Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Oklahoma/History_of_Science_Since_the_17th_Century_(Fall_2016).
Today, I drafted my article's "lead Section."Hrm0815 (talk) 03:17, 13 November 2016 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Oklahoma/History_of_Science_Since_the_17th_Century_(Fall_2016)
Feedback/ Peer Review
Overall, I thought the article was informative and concise. I did not notice any errors in spelling or grammar. I think the information in this article was presented in an academic, encyclopedic tone as well as non-persuasive. I do think the article needs more headers and sections. I would try "Career" or "Personal Life." I think this would help make the article easier to read and the information easier to present. Good luck! Pham8713 (talk) 02:33, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Looking good!
Hey! Your article is looking good so far! I would like to see some of her photography under the photography section along with some of the background on the photo. I think it would give good perspective on her and her life. Just my opinion. Harg6896 (talk) 03:43, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! I tried to find a picture once and I came up short. There are not many pictures out there when you go to insert a picture from the internet. You can see a picture of her at the Birdsacre website, but I'm not sure how to get that on Wikipedia. Thanks for reviewing! Hrm0815 (talk) 05:10, 21 November 2016 (UTC)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Oklahoma/History_of_Science_Since_the_17th_Century_(Fall_2016)
- ^ May-McGrath, Elizabeth. "Stanwood, Cornelia". http://maineanencyclopedia.com/. Retrieved November 6, 2016.
{{cite web}}
: External link in
(help)|website=
- ^ Bonta, Marcia Myers (1995). American women afield : writings by pioneering women naturalists (1st ed. ed.). College Station: Texas A&M university press. pp. 114–124. ISBN 978-0890966341.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help);|edition=
has extra text (help) - ^ Richardson, Cynthia Watkins, "Picturing Nature: Education, Ornithology and Photography in the Life of Cordelia Stanwood: 1865-1958" (2002). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 195.