User talk:31.223.138.86: Difference between revisions
Peacemaker67's behaviour |
Peacemaker67's behaviour |
||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 03:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's [[Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines|talk page]] to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among editors. You can post a request for help at an [[Wikipedia:Noticeboards|appropriate noticeboard]] or seek [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution|dispute resolution]]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary [[Wikipedia:Protection policy|page protection]]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing.'''<!-- Template:uw-ew --> [[User:Peacemaker67|Peacemaker67]] ([[User_talk:Peacemaker67|click to talk to me]]) 03:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC) |
||
== |
== Peacemaker67's behaviour == |
||
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Peacemaker67#Greater_Serbia |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Peacemaker67#Greater_Serbia |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
Is that allowed or not? |
Is that allowed or not? |
||
== Peacemaker67's behaviour == |
== Peacemaker67's behaviour == |
Revision as of 05:24, 11 December 2016
Welcome!
December 2016
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Greater Serbia. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:19, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Peacemaker67's behaviour
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Peacemaker67#Greater_Serbia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Peacemaker67#My_ability_to_follow_simple_instructions
I don't have any "concerns".
My quite simple question was if I was allowed to ask for a scientific source of the 20th or 21st century English term regarding an ideology from 19th century.
Is that allowed or not?
- You can indicate on an article's Talk page what you may see as deficiencies or inaccuracies in the article. You are not allowed to add this commentary within the article itself, and certainly not to do so persistently after it is removed and you have been advised not to do so (which is called disruptive editing). As previously suggested, please use the article's Talk page at Talk:Greater Serbia to express your concerns about the content of the article Greater Serbia. General Ization Talk 05:06, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
1. I did't try to add this commentary within the article itself. What are you talking about?
2. I apologize, but I didn't claim that there were any inaccuracies in the article. I was simply asking for a scientific source of the 20th or 21st century English term regarding an ideology from 19th century.
Is that allowed or not?
Peacemaker67's behaviour
Previous paragraph was also originally entitled: "Peacemaker67's behaviour". It was regarding Peacemaker67's starting "two edits edit war" and blocking an opponent from editing.
Why the headline was changed?