Talk:Citizendium: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:22, 17 September 2006

The context is well defined, this is an official project proposal by one of the founders of Wikipedia. Announced today. conTEXT is very clear defined, WP:CSD A1 not met. Tobias Conradi (Talk) 17:24, 15 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The current edition of this article is biased against Larry and pro-Wikipedia. Isn't the idea that Wikipedia is neutral on everything in articles, even itself?

Then research and fix it. (The article's less than a day old - odds are it will improve.) Peter Grey 17:14, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is little to research, given how new the project is! Anyhow the bias is/was in the choice of language not so much the choice of facts. As for fixing it, often it is better to tell others of their mistakes so that they don't make them again, rather than just quietly fixing them oneself. Better to teach how to fish... etc etc. Athash 21:41, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, I'm surprised that this talk page isn't a hundred screens long (yet). Are all the American Wikipedians too busy watching football to check Slashdot? Melchoir 17:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, the problem is that American Wikipedian Slashdotters are too busy reading and posting on Slashdot to arrive at this forum in a timely fashion. Rydra Wong 18:50, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

HAHAHAHAHA.. I hate Slashdotters' jokes, they seriously start to creep on my neves. --nlitement ^[talk] 19:05, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

But as an American Wikipedian Slashdot Troll (AWST?) I hereby edit this article. The Citizendium FAQ tried hard to be nice, but there was an obvious emphasis on how Wikipedia doesn't respect experts enough. Added/ King 21:45, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion

I commend your attention to the third edit to this page: a proposal for speedy deletion. The eloquent edit summary, reproduced here verbatim: "Huh?"

That's what Wikipedia has far too much of: "contributions" by people who know nothing. Some of us will be delighted to see that fixed. -ikkyu2 (talk) 00:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add a link for this?

His user page has somthing about this now: [1]. Is it allowed to add links for userpages on namespace articles?---Scott3 _Talk _{Contributions} _{Count: 950+} 02:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 That's what Wikipedia has far too much of: "contributions" by people who know nothing.  Some of us will be delighted to see that fixed.  -<font color="#2000C0">[[User:Ikkyu2|ikkyu2]]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">[[User_talk:Ikkyu2|talk]]</font>) 00:12, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
+== Add a link for this? ==
+His user page has somthing about this now:
+[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Larry_Sanger].
+Is it allowed to add links for userpages on namespace articles?---[[User:Scott3|Scott3]] <sub>[[User talk:Scott3|Talk]]</sub> <sub>[[Special:Contributions/Scott3|Contributions]]</sub> <sub> [http://tools.wikimedia.de/~essjay/edit_count/Count.php?username=scott3&submit=Count Count: 950+] </sub> 02:22, 17 September 2006 (UTC)