Talk:Edward de Vere, 17th Earl of Oxford: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Stan Shebs (talk | contribs) not quite there |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== This article as of 17 September, 2006, is bullshit == |
|||
Did Edward de Vere kill this guy's family or something? [[User:141.157.203.65|141.157.203.65]] 03:59, 9 November 2005 (UTC) |
|||
I don't know what's been going on in the past, but this article has got to be restored to a rational form (1911, if necessary) and locked. The Oxfordian cult has taken it over. |
|||
[[User:John W. Kennedy|John W. Kennedy]] 02:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC) |
|||
== Whitewashing his pederasty? == |
== Whitewashing his pederasty? == |
||
Revision as of 02:11, 18 September 2006
This article as of 17 September, 2006, is bullshit
I don't know what's been going on in the past, but this article has got to be restored to a rational form (1911, if necessary) and locked. The Oxfordian cult has taken it over.
John W. Kennedy 02:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Whitewashing his pederasty?
Why are de Vere's flings with Italian boys repeatedly being deleted from this article?! Haiduc 20:04, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
- Got a reputable source? We're being more careful about deleting unsourced claims these days. Stan 00:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
- How about this? [1]
Also, this: [2].
Those phrase as accusations, not proof. It would be better to cite from the book that one of the websites mentions, which probably has more detail about who was doing the accusing and when. Stan 16:47, 20 December 2005 (UTC)