User talk:Svrodgers: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:23, 11 February 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Svrodgers, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Gap9551 (talk) 05:10, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 7 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Venus Williams page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help stop Fyunck(click)'s disruptive editing of the Serena Williams page.

Upon investigation of his or her edits and talk page, I have established that Fyunck(click) is a racist with an anti-Serena agenda, who is hellbent on being very disruptive on the Serena Williams article, and should be stopped.

Reading the talk page of the Serena Williams article, I agree that "Many" is the correct wording in qualifying how Serena Williams has been received by the tennis community and the general public as GOAT. It's a no-brainer, given her accolades, hundreds of sources and articles and pundits and players and fans out there saying exactly that, so how is this even a discussion or an issue? I noticed that the Roger Federer article says "Many" analysts have called him the GOAT, so why is that allowed to stand, if "many" is a peacocking word this user, Fyunck(click) has claimed? And why has this user Fyunck(click) spent less time fighting that word "many" being used for Roger Federer article and more time fighting the word being used for Serena? I find that highly suspect and hypocritical.

I would be interested to know your thoughts and how to proceed forward in getting that word "some" changed to "many" in the Serena Williams article, because upon questioned and challenged, this user Fyunck(click), has resorted to making false accusations, attacking people, bullying and trying to get people blocked. An example is an extract edit below found on Fyunck(click)'s talk page.

"I did not notice that but I'll take a look. Thanks. Between him, Svrodgers, and Thad caldwell, plus your Aries009 mention, we might have a blend that needs to be looked at by an administrator. Fyunck(click) (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC) talk page".

So basically this user tries to get anyone with a different opinion who disagrees with his or her edits blocked. That should not be acceptable.