Jump to content

Talk:Tino Sanandaji: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
"Despite having no formal education on the subject," This seems like a strange thing to say about someone with a PhD. When you're a PhD economist, your own research IS the formal education. Definitely violates neutrality. [[Special:Contributions/216.232.155.236|216.232.155.236]] ([[User talk:216.232.155.236|talk]]) 18:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
"Despite having no formal education on the subject," This seems like a strange thing to say about someone with a PhD. When you're a PhD economist, your own research IS the formal education. Definitely violates neutrality. [[Special:Contributions/216.232.155.236|216.232.155.236]] ([[User talk:216.232.155.236|talk]]) 18:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
:It is relevant because his PhD is not in the area he writes about. This is an encyclopaedic resource, not a [[WP:SOAP|forum or blog]] where you get to pick and choose what information should be conveyed according to your own [[WP:POV]]. Your argument is pure [[WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT]]. --[[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 20:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
:It is relevant because his PhD is not in the area he writes about. This is an encyclopaedic resource, not a [[WP:SOAP|forum or blog]] where you get to pick and choose what information should be conveyed according to your own [[WP:POV]]. Your argument is pure [[WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT]]. --[[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 20:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
:His PhD is in public policy. He writes about immigration policy. "Despite having no formal education on the subject," is a way of implying that he doesn't know what he's talking about, which is not neutral.
:His PhD is in public policy. He writes about immigration policy. "Despite having no formal education on the subject," is a way of implying that he doesn't know what he's talking about, which is not neutral. [[Special:Contributions/2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04|2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04]] ([[User talk:2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04|talk]]) 00:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)


== Tagging article for reliable, 3rd party sources ==
== Tagging article for reliable, 3rd party sources ==

Revision as of 00:59, 22 February 2017

WikiProject iconChicago Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconArticles for creation Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Note icon
This article was accepted from this draft on 11 December 2015 by reviewer Eat me, I'm an azuki (talk · contribs).

Article, Media, Reports, Lecture List

I have removed the excessive list of articles, media, reports and lectures. It took up the vast majority of the article. I don't think an entry should read like a C.V.--Frostiga flingor (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Who cares about formal education?

"Despite having no formal education on the subject," This seems like a strange thing to say about someone with a PhD. When you're a PhD economist, your own research IS the formal education. Definitely violates neutrality. 216.232.155.236 (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is relevant because his PhD is not in the area he writes about. This is an encyclopaedic resource, not a forum or blog where you get to pick and choose what information should be conveyed according to your own WP:POV. Your argument is pure WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
His PhD is in public policy. He writes about immigration policy. "Despite having no formal education on the subject," is a way of implying that he doesn't know what he's talking about, which is not neutral. 2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging article for reliable, 3rd party sources

Having checked through the sources, I see nothing to back up Sanandaji's notability. The entire article is based on WP:BLPSPS and WP:QS, and smacks of being a promotional piece focussing on his personal political positions rather than demonstrating that he is genuinely notable. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]