Talk:Tino Sanandaji: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
"Despite having no formal education on the subject," This seems like a strange thing to say about someone with a PhD. When you're a PhD economist, your own research IS the formal education. Definitely violates neutrality. [[Special:Contributions/216.232.155.236|216.232.155.236]] ([[User talk:216.232.155.236|talk]]) 18:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
"Despite having no formal education on the subject," This seems like a strange thing to say about someone with a PhD. When you're a PhD economist, your own research IS the formal education. Definitely violates neutrality. [[Special:Contributions/216.232.155.236|216.232.155.236]] ([[User talk:216.232.155.236|talk]]) 18:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
:It is relevant because his PhD is not in the area he writes about. This is an encyclopaedic resource, not a [[WP:SOAP|forum or blog]] where you get to pick and choose what information should be conveyed according to your own [[WP:POV]]. Your argument is pure [[WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT]]. --[[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 20:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
:It is relevant because his PhD is not in the area he writes about. This is an encyclopaedic resource, not a [[WP:SOAP|forum or blog]] where you get to pick and choose what information should be conveyed according to your own [[WP:POV]]. Your argument is pure [[WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT]]. --[[User:Iryna Harpy|Iryna Harpy]] ([[User talk:Iryna Harpy|talk]]) 20:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
:His PhD is in public policy. He writes about immigration policy. "Despite having no formal education on the subject," is a way of implying that he doesn't know what he's talking about, which is not neutral. |
:His PhD is in public policy. He writes about immigration policy. "Despite having no formal education on the subject," is a way of implying that he doesn't know what he's talking about, which is not neutral. [[Special:Contributions/2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04|2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04]] ([[User talk:2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04|talk]]) 00:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC) |
||
== Tagging article for reliable, 3rd party sources == |
== Tagging article for reliable, 3rd party sources == |
Revision as of 00:59, 22 February 2017
Chicago Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Articles for creation Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Article, Media, Reports, Lecture List
I have removed the excessive list of articles, media, reports and lectures. It took up the vast majority of the article. I don't think an entry should read like a C.V.--Frostiga flingor (talk) 23:24, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
Who cares about formal education?
"Despite having no formal education on the subject," This seems like a strange thing to say about someone with a PhD. When you're a PhD economist, your own research IS the formal education. Definitely violates neutrality. 216.232.155.236 (talk) 18:58, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- It is relevant because his PhD is not in the area he writes about. This is an encyclopaedic resource, not a forum or blog where you get to pick and choose what information should be conveyed according to your own WP:POV. Your argument is pure WP:JUSTDONTLIKEIT. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:15, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
- His PhD is in public policy. He writes about immigration policy. "Despite having no formal education on the subject," is a way of implying that he doesn't know what he's talking about, which is not neutral. 2001:569:718C:DE00:FC75:41C1:A468:F04 (talk) 00:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Tagging article for reliable, 3rd party sources
Having checked through the sources, I see nothing to back up Sanandaji's notability. The entire article is based on WP:BLPSPS and WP:QS, and smacks of being a promotional piece focussing on his personal political positions rather than demonstrating that he is genuinely notable. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 04:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)