User talk:Iryna Harpy

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

User Zocklandy[edit]

Hi Iryna. After your revers of edits by this user, he has beem making more of the same. I have dropped him messages on his talk page. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 10:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)

Sorry, Rui Gabriel Correia, I'm a little tardy, but I'm responding on the article's talk page and reverting the user's latest round of edit warring now. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 19:06, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Geographical distribution[edit]

Thanks for your question. Please see main article ′Ukrainian diaspora′ XXI century. There are more one hundred and twenty countries. Sincerely, Yourreader

a reliable source[edit]

Hi, Iryna, you wrote to me: "you didn't provide a reliable source". I've provided reference to the Wiki article on Mikhail Epstein. Which other sources should be provided? Thank you, Markitin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markitin (talkcontribs) 21:04, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Unconstructive editing in Reconquista[edit]

Hi Iryna, hope you are doing well! As as follow-up to other edits in several articles, the IP editor 174.119 has made also a foray w unconstructive edits in Reconquista. S/he has been sufficiently warned, is there any way to stop by now this disruption quickly by an administrator? Best regards Iñaki LL (talk) 10:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Iñaki LL. I've added the article to my watchlist, and your latest reverts seem to be holding. It seems that this user is going OR and POV on a number of articles in the subject area of history. They've not been constructive, but there aren't enough edits in their history to do much other than keep an eye on their 'contributions'. There also hasn't been enough activity to suggest that it's a blocked user, so it may well just be a boorish newbie who thinks that their position on any given subject - and long-winded edit summaries about how wrong the content they're changing is - is good editing practice. I'm going to go AGF on this one and push them to use article talk pages and, most importantly, familiarise themselves with policies and guidelines. They'll A) get bored; B) might set up an account and try to learn the ropes; C) keep pushing and get blocked for not being HERE. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 18:03, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
I think I have met the editor before, his content approach is not something I can identify clearly w a certain profile, sometimes looks like another editor blocked, but it gives a bit of a headache anyway. Best, Iñaki LL (talk) 18:27, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
@Iñaki LL: Yes, it's frustrating. I'm also reminded of 2 blocked editors, but there isn't enough evidence yet. The tone of the edit summaries really makes me think it's one blocked editor in particular, but I wouldn't be able to tell unless he discussed something in more detail on one of the talk pages. Oh, well. As long as there's at least 2 of us watching, we'll be able to work it out if they keep editing... Best for now! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 09:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2017[edit]

What on earth you are talking about!?! Have I angered you somehow? Whatever your reasons's are, please stop harassing me, OK? And then I will stop editing Wikipedia, OK? :)

FrankCesco26 is still editing despite being blocked[edit]

Hello Iryna. I just opened a sock investigation since I am almost sure that one of the IPs whose edits you recently reverted (Religion in Belgium) is FrankCesco26 bypassing his block. He also added a pie chart to Religion in Sweden with another IP, and there are possibly other edits made with further more IPs. These IPs edit from the exact location where FrankCesco26 once revealed to live, and they show the same editing pattern.--Wddan (talk) 22:25, 2 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Wddan. Yes, I've been watching the various articles he edits, and am aware of his 'soft' temporary block. I'm on medical treatment at the moment, and my energy levels are very low, but I'm keeping an eye on the situation. While he may be AGF to an extent, after the battleground mentality he has continued to display, the admin is being extremely lenient. Do keep me updated by pinging me (as you've been doing). I may not respond, but I'm ready to step in again should it be necessary. Keep up the good work! --Iryna Harpy (talk) 21:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)



This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Robert McClenon (talk) 17:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Genetic data[edit]

Thank for you message. Most of countries in the page of Latin America show genetics data (please review Brazil, Argentina, Cuba, Uruguay, etc.) because this kind of data are most reliable than how people think about them genetic sources (citation). I did add another sources. Thank.

Anti-Russian sentiment among Vietnamese[edit]

Yes, I do have my sources. You can look on Anti-Russian sentiment#Vietnam, I have provided these links. Of course it is not in English, but hope it helps. talk.