Talk:Rhynchelmis orientalis: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Erm... what the heck is this? |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==What is it?== |
==What is it?== |
||
I think the article could be somewhat improved if it mentioned ''what the heck this is'', as well as its Latin name. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 10:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC) |
I think the article could be somewhat improved if it mentioned ''what the heck this is'', as well as its Latin name. --[[User:Dweller|Dweller]] 10:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
Well, I have only just started, and don't have much time to write at each session. Initially, I'd prefer to get at least ''something'' down about each species, to which more can later be added. I am not sure about what you mean with your comment about its Latin name - it is already there, and to my knowledge, there is no common name to this (or, indeed, most of the other) species. --[[User:Grijndvar|Grijndvar]] 09:15, 20 September 2006 (Swedish time) |
|||
Revision as of 07:16, 20 September 2006
What is it?
I think the article could be somewhat improved if it mentioned what the heck this is, as well as its Latin name. --Dweller 10:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Well, I have only just started, and don't have much time to write at each session. Initially, I'd prefer to get at least something down about each species, to which more can later be added. I am not sure about what you mean with your comment about its Latin name - it is already there, and to my knowledge, there is no common name to this (or, indeed, most of the other) species. --Grijndvar 09:15, 20 September 2006 (Swedish time)